Back

A Brain Reward Circuit Inhibited By Next-Generation Weight Loss Drugs

Godschall, E. N.; Gungul, T. B.; Sajonia, I. R.; Buyukaksakal, A. K.; Ogilvie, S.; Keeler, A. B.; Zhang, Y.; Deutsch, T. C. J.; Shi, Y.; Conley, N. J.; Webster, A. N.; Calhan, O. Y.; Akkoub, A.; Malik, K.; West, K. I.; Karthikeyan, A.; van Gerven, G.; Patel, M. K.; Campbell, J. N.; Deppmann, C. D.; Guler, A. D.

2024-12-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.12.12.628169 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) effectively reduce body weight and improve metabolic outcomes, yet established peptide-based therapies require injections and complex manufacturing. Small-molecule GLP1RAs promise oral bioavailability and scalable manufacturing, but their selective binding to human versus rodent receptors has limited mechanistic studies. Here, we developed humanized GLP1R mouse models to investigate how small-molecule GLP1RAs influence feeding behavior. This approach revealed that these compounds regulate both homeostatic and hedonic feeding through parallel neural circuits. Beyond engaging canonical hypothalamic and hindbrain networks that control metabolic homeostasis, GLP1RAs recruit a discrete population of Glp1r-expressing neurons in the central amygdala, which selectively suppress the consumption of palatable foods by reducing dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. Stimulating these central amygdalar neurons curtail hedonic feeding, whereas targeted deletion of the receptor in this cell population specifically diminishes the anorectic efficacy of GLP1RAs for reward-driven intake. These findings reveal a dedicated neural circuit through which small molecule GLP1RAs modulate reward processing, suggesting broad therapeutic potential in conditions of dysregulated dopamine signaling including substance use disorder and binge eating.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.