Modulating Prestimulus Alpha and Beta Power with tRNS Establishes Their Causal Role in Visual Perception
Wei, J.; Zou, H.; Tang, Q.; Yao, Z.; Huang, G.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, Z.
Show abstract
Variability in visual perception in response to consistent stimuli is a fundamental phenomenon linked to fluctuations in prestimulus low-frequency neural oscillations--particularly in the alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands--typically measured by their power in electroencephalography (EEG) signals. However, the causal role of these prestimulus alpha and beta power fluctuations in visual perception remains unestablished. In this study, we investigated whether prestimulus alpha and beta power causally affect visual perception using transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS). In a sham-controlled, single-blind, within-subject design, 29 participants performed a visual detection task while receiving occipital tRNS. Online functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure cortical excitability during stimulation, and offline EEG signals were collected after stimulation. Mental fatigue was incorporated as a state-dependent factor influencing tRNS effects. Our findings demonstrate that, primarily under low fatigue states, tRNS increased cortical excitability during stimulation (indicated by increased fNIRS oxyhemoglobin amplitude), decreased subsequent prestimulus EEG alpha and beta power, and consequently reduced the visual contrast threshold (VCT), indicating enhanced visual perception. Sensitivity analysis revealed that alpha oscillations contributed more significantly to visual perception than beta oscillations under low fatigue. Additionally, the state-dependent effects of tRNS may result from different sensitivities of VCT to neural oscillations across fatigue states. These results provide causal evidence linking prestimulus alpha and beta power to visual perception and underscore the importance of considering brain states in neuromodulation research. Our study advances the understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying visual perception and suggests potential therapeutic applications targeting neural oscillations. Significance statementUnderstanding why we perceive identical visual stimuli differently is a fundamental question in neuroscience. This study provides causal evidence that prestimulus alpha and beta neural oscillations directly influence visual perception, particularly under low mental fatigue state. By using tRNS alongside fNIRS and EEG recordings, we demonstrate that modulating neural excitability can alter perceptual outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of considering brain state--such as fatigue levels--in neuromodulation research. This work advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying visual perception and opens avenues for developing targeted interventions to enhance sensory processing and cognitive functions, potentially benefiting individuals with perceptual or attentional disorders.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase-specific manipulation of neural oscillatory activity by transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
- Working memory enhancement using real-time phase-tuned transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
- Transcranial direct current stimulation elevates the baseline activity while sharpening the spatial tuning of the human visual cortex 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct and complementary mechanisms of oscillatory and aperiodic alpha activity in visuospatial attention 95%
- Phase-synchronized 40Hz tACS and iTBS effects on gamma oscillations 94%
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of alpha oscillations in a premotor-cerebellar loop in modulation of motor learning: insights from transcranial alternating current stimulation 95%
- A Practical Preprocessing Pipeline for Concurrent TMS-iEEG: Critical Steps and Methodological Considerations 94%
- Recognizing EEG responses to active TMS vs. sham stimulations in different TMS-EEG datasets: a machine learning approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial stimulation of alpha oscillations upregulates the default mode network 96%
- Decoding across sensory modalities reveals common supramodal signatures of conscious perception 95%
- Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation Promotes Focal Sensorimotor Activation that Accelerates Brain-Computer Interface Skill Learning 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.