Test-retest reliability of auditory MMN measured with OPM-MEG
Demko, L.; Iglesias, S.; Mellor, S.; Bassi, C.; Brand, K.; Kalberer, A.; Koechli, L.; Marino, S.; Zimmermann, N. D.; Heinzle, J.; Stephan, K. E.
Show abstract
In this paper, we report results from an investigation of auditory mismatch responses as measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG) based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPM). Specifically, as part of a quality control study, we examined the reliability and validity of auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) recordings, obtained with a newly installed OPM-MEG system. Based on OPM-MEG data from 30 healthy volunteers, measured twice with an established auditory MMN paradigm with frequency deviants, we examined the following questions: First, we focused on construct validity and examined whether OPM-MEG measurements of MMN responses (in terms of event-related fields, ERFs) were qualitatively comparable to previous MMN findings from studies using EEG or MEG based on superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). In particular, we examined whether significant MMN responses measured by OPM-MEG occurred in a comparable time window and showed a similar topography as in previous EEG/MEG studies of MMN. Second, we quantified test-retest reliability of MMN amplitude and latency over two separate measurement sessions. The results of our analyses show that MMN responses recorded with OPM-MEG are in good agreement with previously reported MMN results in terms of timing and topography. Furthermore, the comparison of group-level MMN topographies and timeseries shows excellent consistency across the two measurement sessions. Our quantitative test-retest reliability analyses at the sensor level indicate good reliability for MMN amplitude, but poor reliability for MMN latency. Overall, our findings suggest that OPM-MEG measurements of auditory MMN (i) are comparable to results from EEG and SQUID-based MEG and (ii) show good test-retest reliability for amplitude measures at the sensor level. Notably, these results were achieved in an "out of the box" state of the OPM-MEG system, shortly after installation and without further optimisation. The reason for the insufficient reliability for MMN latency we observed is currently under investigation and represents an important target for future improvements.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- On-scalp MEG SQUIDs are sensitive to early somatosensory activity unseen by conventional MEG 98%
- Using OPMs to measure neural activity in standing, mobile participants 98%
- Picture naming yields highly consistent cortical activation patterns: test-retest reliability of magnetoencephalography recordings 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Magnetoencephalography can reveal deep brain network activities linked to memory processes 97%
- Rapid invisible frequency tagging reveals nonlinear integration of auditory and visual information 96%
- Alpha oscillations do not implement gain control in early visual cortex but rather gating in parieto-occipital regions 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Visual working memory recruits two functionally distinct alpha rhythms in posterior cortex 96%
- No evidence of musical training influencing the cortical contribution to the speech-FFR and its modulation through selective attention 96%
- Eye Movements in Silent Visual Speech track Unheard Acoustic Signals and Relate to Hearing Experience 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentanglement of Resting State Brain Networks for Localizing Epileptogenic Zone in Focal Epilepsy 95%
- Optimizing EEG source reconstruction with concurrent fMRI-derived spatial priors 95%
- Qualitative and Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Common Normal Variants and Physiological Artifacts in MEG and EEG 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.