Back

Discrimination of inherent characteristics of susceptible and resistant strains of Anopheles gambiae by explainable Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Flight Trajectories

Qureshi, Y.; Voloshin, V.; Gleave, K.; Ranson, H.; McCall, P.; Towers, C.; Covington, J.; Towers, D.

2024-12-15 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.12.10.627548 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding mosquito behaviours is vital for development of insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs), which have been successfully deployed in sub-Saharan Africa to reduce disease transmission, particularly malaria. However, rising insecticide resistance (IR) among mosquito populations, owing to genetic and behavioural changes, poses a significant challenge. We present a machine learning pipeline that successfully distinguishes between IR and insecticide-susceptible (IS) mosquito behaviours by analysing trajectory data. Data driven methods are introduced to accommodate common tracking system shortcomings that occur due to mosquito positions being occluded by the bednet or other objects. Trajectories, obtained from room-scale tracking of two IR and two IS strains around a human-baited, untreated bednet, were analysed using features such as velocity, acceleration, and geometric descriptors. Using these features, an XGBoost model achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.743 and a ROC AUC of 0.813 in classifying IR from IS mosquitoes. SHAP analysis helped decipher that IR mosquitoes tend to fly slower with more directed flight paths and lower variability than IS--traits that are likely a fitness advantage by enhancing their ability to respond more quickly to bloodmeal cues. This approach provides valuable insights based on flight behaviour that can reveal the action of interventions and insecticides on mosquito physiology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.