Back

Targeted neural stimulation congruent with immersive reality decreases neuropathic pain

Aurucci, G. V.; Gozzi, N.; Wagner, M.; Preatoni, G.; Brunello, N.; Katic Secerovic, N.; Zipser, C.; Raspopovic, S.

2024-12-11 pain medicine
10.1101/2024.12.10.24318374
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic neuropathic pain is a complex experience, posing a major challenge in personalizing its treatment. Present treatments consist of non-specific, standardized drugs that are often addictive, leaving many patients non-respondent and with significant side effects. Designing individualized therapies requires targeting the multidimensionality of pain and developing objective endpoints to demonstrate their effectiveness. Currently, non-pharmacological alternatives are emerging, such as neurostimulation and Virtual Reality (VR), activating pain relief via peripheral neuromodulation and attention modulation. Similarly to drugs, many neurostimulation approaches are unspecific, targeting areas near the pain site and disregarding the neural pathway of pain. Above all, neurostimulation and VR are yet to be evaluated as a combined synergistic intervention, particularly in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Methods and FindingsTo this aim, we developed a targeted neurostimulation congruent with immersive VR platform providing a multisensory pain intervention through the synergistic application of somatotopic electro-tactile and visual stimuli. The endpoints included measuring sensory, neurophysiological (EEG), and self-reported indicators of pain. We tested the efficacy of the multisensory intervention against the control consisting of VR-only intervention on four consecutive intervention days in an RCT (N=18 neuropathic patients). The multisensory intervention resulted in a clinically significant reduction of pain (>50%), lasting up to one-week follow-up. The provided analgesic effect was statistically stronger compared to the VR-only control across treatment days and at follow-up. The clinically relevant pain decrease was accompanied with objective improvements in tactile acuity, proprioceptive measures, and changes in EEG pain biomarkers for the multisensory intervention group only. ConclusionsThe developed multisensory treatment showed a clinically significant reductions in self-reported pain, supported by improvements in objective sensory and neurophysiological measures. These results represent a significant advancement in the treatment and assessment of pain, offering a non-invasive, accessible, and cost-effective solution for neuropathic pain, a major societal burden and one of the most prevalent neurological conditions worldwide. Clinical trial registrationThe trial was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT05483816).

Matching journals

1
Pain
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.1%
185× avg
2
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
#1
179× avg
3
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
109× avg
4
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 53%
8.5%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 29 published papers
Top 0.3%
38× avg
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 30%
6.0%
7
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.2%
40× avg
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 6%
4.0× avg
9
Brain
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 69 published papers
Top 5%
5.0× avg
10
Brain Sciences
MDPI AG · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.5%
23× avg
11
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.9%
15× avg
12
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 4%
5.5× avg
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
14
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Elsevier BV · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
15
Social Science & Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
IOP Publishing · based on 19 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
17
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
9.5× avg
18
Science Advances
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) · based on 52 published papers
Top 3%
7.2× avg
19
Cerebral Cortex
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.6%
28× avg
20
eLife
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd · based on 262 published papers
Top 26%
0.9%
21
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
9.9× avg
22
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 10%
0.9%
23
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 48%
0.9%
24
Neurology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 38 published papers
Top 6%
2.7× avg
25
Molecular Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 84 published papers
Top 6%
2.8× avg
26
Cell Reports
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
27
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 12%
0.8%