Intestinal somatic mutations in inflammatory bowel disease patients are enriched in very early onset IBD and primary immunodeficiency genes
Hidding, I. J.; Vich Vila, A.; Hu, S.; Bourgonje, A. R.; Van Gijn, M.; Maassen, W. T. K.; Van der Vries, G.; Ruigrok, R. A. A. A.; Andreu-Sanchez, S.; Jansen, B. H.; van Dullemen, H. M.; Visschedijk, M. C.; Dijkstra, G.; Swertz, M. A.; Van Diemen, C. C.; Festen, E. A. M.; Weersma, R. K.; Imhann, F.
Show abstract
The genetic predisposition of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the germline is well-established, while the potential role of somatic mutations in IBD remains underexplored. We aim to identify somatic mutations in intestinal mucosa and study their potential role in IBD pathogenesis. We identified somatic mutations using 538 intestinal biopsies and 268 blood samples from 268 IBD patients and 51 intestinal biopsies from 19 non-IBD controls. Mutations were called from RNA-seq data and whole exome sequencing data using Mutect2 software. Pathogenicity of mutations was predicted using the Variant Interpretation Pipeline. Mutation frequency and patterns were compared between IBD and controls, and within IBD-subgroups, considering both inflammation status and tissue of origin. IBD-affected tissue exhibited a significantly higher burden of somatic mutations compared to controls (p=0.02), with a striking enrichment for predicted likely pathogenic or pathogenic (pLP-P) mutations (p=2.07e-09). Notably, within IBD biopsies, pLP-P mutations were enriched in very early onset-IBD (VEO-IBD) genes (p[≤]2.2e-16) and primary immune deficiency (PID) genes (p[≤]2.2e-16), showing a 5.5-fold increase compared to non-IBD. Inflamed tissue showed an increase in mutations in PID and IBD-GWAS associated genes. Additionally, we identified pathogenic mutations in many IBD genes, such as the stop-gained mutation (c.517C>T) in HPS1, and many pLP-P mutations across the JAK-STAT pathway. Our analysis reveals widespread accumulation of pLP-P somatic mutations in IBD-affected tissue compared to non-IBD controls, with significant enrichment in genes that cause monogenic VEO-IBD. These findings suggest that somatic mutations can contribute to the initiation and perpetuation of inflammation in IBD.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Antigen-driven expansion of public clonal T cell populations in inflammatory bowel diseases 96%
- Intestinal receptor of SARS-CoV-2 in inflamed IBD tissue is downregulated by HNF4A in ileum and upregulated by interferon regulating factors in colon 95%
- An extremes of phenotype approach confirms significant genetic heterogeneity in patients with ulcerative colitis. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing Cellular and Transcriptional diversity of IIeal Mucosa amongst Treatment Naïve and Treated Crohn’s disease 95%
- Differential expression of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) in mice susceptible or resistant to chronic colitis 93%
- Molecular network analyses implicate death-associated protein kinase 3 (DAPK3) as a key factor in colitis-associated dysplasia progression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut microbial and human genetic signatures of inflammatory bowel disease increase risk of comorbid mental disorders 94%
- Discordance between a deep learning model and clinical-grade variant pathogenicity classification in a rare disease cohort 93%
- The landscape of driver mutations in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Specific gut pathobionts escape antibody coating and are enriched during flares in patients with severe Crohn's disease 93%
- Low coverage whole genome sequencing of low-grade dysplasia strongly predicts colorectal cancer risk in ulcerative colitis 93%
- Maintenance therapy with infliximab or vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease is not associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence: UK experience in the 2020 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.