Back

Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers for Steatosis Stages in MASLD Patients: an Algorithmic Approach Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Trifylli, E. M.; Angelakis, A.; Kriebardis, A. G.; Papadopoulos, N.; Fortis, S. P.; Pantazatou, V.; Koskinas, I.; Kranidioti, H.; Koustas, E.; Sarantis, P.; Manolakopoulos, S.; Deutsch, M.

2024-12-08 gastroenterology
10.1101/2024.12.07.24318644 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background & AimsMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as NAFLD, is a leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Current diagnostic methods, including liver biopsies, are invasive and have significant limitations, emphasizing the need for non-invasive alternatives. This study aimed to evaluate extracellular vesicles (EV) as biomarkers for diagnosing and staging steatosis in MASLD patients, utilizing machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). MethodsThis prospective, single-center cohort study was conducted at the GI-Liver Unit, Hippocration General Hospital, Athens. It included 76 MASLD patients with ultrasound-confirmed steatosis and at least one cardiometabolic risk factor. Patients underwent transient elastography for steatosis and fibrosis staging and blood sampling for EV analysis using nanoparticle tracking. Twenty machine learning models were developed. Six to distinguish non-steatosis (S0) from steatosis (S1-S3), and fourteen to identify severe steatosis (S3). Models incorporated EV measurements (size and concentration), anthropomorphic and clinical features, with performance evaluated using AUROC and SHAP-based interpretability methods. ResultsThe CB-C1a model achieved, on average on 10 random splits of 5-fold cross validation (5CV) of the train set, an AUROC of 0.71/0.86 (train/test) for distinguishing S0 from S1-S3 steatosis stages, relying on EV alone. The CB-C2h-21 model identified severe steatosis (S3), on average on 10 random splits of 3-fold cross validation (3CV) of the train set, with an AUROC of 0.81/1.00 (train/test), demonstrating superior performance when combining EV with anthropomorphic and clinical features such as diabetes and advanced fibrosis. Key EV features, including mean size and concentration, were identified as important predictors. SHAP analysis highlighted complex non-linear relationships between features and steatosis staging. ConclusionsEV are promising non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosing and staging MASLD. The integration of ML-enhanced EV analysis with clinical features offers a scalable, patient-friendly alternative to invasive liver biopsies, advancing precision in MASLD management. Further research should refine these methods for broader clinical application. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=99 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24318644v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (36K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@128d63borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8ed52org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14c356org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1244845_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.9%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
3
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
5
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
20
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%