Multiple within species comparisons show Tanganyikan cichlid fish have larger brains in less structurally complex habitats

Many studies have found a link between higher habitat structural complexity and increased relative brain size in vertebrates. Here we explore this relationship in a multi-species comparison, comparing ten species of wild cichlids that differ in their social and territorial behaviour, but which occur across four ecologically similar but structurally diverse rocky habitats. This design allows us to perform repeated intra-specific comparisons, avoiding confounds associated with comparisons across species boundaries. We sampled 147 fish, analysing brain size and architecture while controlling for body mass and species-specific variability and compared this with habitat complexity, quantified using underwater video and three-dimensional reconstructions. Our results challenge the Clever Foraging Hypothesis (CFH), which posits that greater habitat complexity correlates with larger brain sizes. Contrary to CFH, fish from the least complex habitat had significantly larger brains. Additionally, brain architecture analysis indicated a significant enlargement of the cerebellum in fish from less complex habitats, whereas the hypothalamus showed a non-significant negative trend. Taken together, these results indicate that lower habitat complexity may impose higher cognitive demands on spatial memory and navigation due to limited refuges and increased predation risk. This study highlights the need to reconsider the assumed linear positive relationship between environmental complexity and brain development, suggesting that simpler environments might also impose significant cognitive and ecological challenges that drive brain evolution. Our findings underscore the importance of considering intra-species variability and the specific ecological and cognitive demands of different habitats in studies of brain evolution.