Back

Twig Age 2.0: Adjusting twig age data for differences in palatability among taxa to track ungulate browsing over sites and time

Waller, D. M.

2024-12-12 ecology
10.1101/2024.12.06.627192 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIUngulate browsing threatens forest tree regeneration and diversity across forests in North America and other temperate regions but is inadequately monitored. This reflects both inadequate commitment and the lack of efficient, reliable methods to accurately track these impacts across sites and over time. C_LIO_LIThe twig age method estimates time: how long twigs grow before being browsed, providing a direct measure of herbivory. The original method aged twigs on maple (Acer) seedlings, but it works well in other deciduous species. Given ungulate preferences for some species, it is important to adjust twig ages to correct for these. C_LIO_LIUsing multiple datasets from many species and sites across the upper Midwest, I confirm the power and sensitivity of the twig age method for assessing and comparing white-tailed deer impacts over time, among species, and across sites. Twig ages respond differently to seedling heights when deer are present, providing an additional indicator. I extend the original method to rank and adjust for differential browsing among species in two ways: using least square means from statistical models and using ratios to adjust values to an Acer saccharum standard. These adjustments match, supporting the use of either to accurately track shifts in browse pressure over time and across sites even when these differ in species composition. C_LIO_LIThe adjusted twig-age method is highly efficient, allowing a sole worker to score 100+ seedlings/saplings within an hour to accurately gauge real-time ungulate impacts at a site. The reliability, power, and versatility of adjusted twig age data set a standard for assessing browse pressure and provide an efficient vehicle to expand programs to monitor deer impacts across landscapes. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.5%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.4%
9
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
11
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
13
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
17
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%