Loom response in mouse superior colliculus depends on sensorimotor context
Zucca, S.; Schulz, A.; Goncalves, P. J.; Macke, J. H.; Saleem, A. B.; Solomon, S. G.
Show abstract
Visual motion is produced both by an organisms movement through the world, and by objects moving in the world such as potential predators. Choosing appropriate behaviour therefore requires organisms to distinguish these sources of visual motion. Here we asked how mice integrate self-movement with looming visual motion by combining virtual reality and neural recordings from superior colliculus (SC), a brain area important in visually-guided approach and avoidance behaviours. We first measured locomotion behaviour and neural activity while animals approached an object in virtual reality, and while the same object loomed at them. In both cases, vision dominated activity in superficial layers (SCs), while locomotion had more influence on activity in intermediate layers (SCim). In addition, animals instinctively slowed their locomotion when nearing the object, or when the object neared them. To directly test animals ability to distinguish self-from object motion we replayed the visual images generated during object approach. Locomotion behaviour often changed during replay, showing animals are able to establish if visual motion is matched to their self-movement. Further, decoders trained on locomotion behaviour, or on population activity in SC, particularly in SCim, were able to reliably discriminate epochs of replay and object approach. We conclude that both mouse behaviour and SC activity encode whether looming visual motion arises from self-or object movement, with implications for understanding sensorimotor coordination in dynamic environments. HighlightsO_LIWe recorded from superficial (SCs) and intermediate (SCim) superior colliculus in VR C_LIO_LIVision dominated SCs, while SCim was modulated by both vision and locomotion C_LIO_LIMice altered behaviour when visual experience did not match that expected from their locomotion C_LIO_LIPopulation activity differed between matched and unmatched visual experiences, particularly in SCim C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Selective enhancement of neural coding in V1 underlies fine discrimination learning in tree shrew. 96%
- Binocular processing facilitates escape behavior through multiple pathways to the superior colliculus 95%
- Look-up and look-down neurons in the mouse visual thalamus during freely moving exploration 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous multiplexed population representations of task context in the mouse primary visual cortex 96%
- A Synaptic Corollary Discharge Signal Suppresses Midbrain Visual Processing During Saccade-Like Locomotion 96%
- An early phase of instructive plasticity in visual cortex before the typical onset of sensory experience 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Opposing influence of top-down and bottom-up input on different types of excitatory layer 2/3 neurons in mouse visual cortex 96%
- Direct Cortical Inputs to Hippocampal Area CA1 Transmit Complementary Signals for Goal-directed Navigation 96%
- Behavioral strategy shapes activation of the Vip-Sst disinhibitory circuit in visual cortex 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.