Back

Association of CD7⁺CXCR3⁺ CAR T cells with long-term remission in R/R DLBCL

Bartolini, R.; Trueb, L.; Daoudlarian, D.; Joo, V.; Noto, A.; Gentner, B.; Stadelmann, R.; Fenwick, C.; Perreau, M.; Coukos, G.; Pantaleo, G.; Arber, C.; Obeid, M.

2024-12-08 oncology
10.1101/2024.12.06.24318600 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background.CAR T-cell therapy is the standard of care for R/R DLBCL, but more than half of patients fail to achieve long-term remission. Identification of cellular biomarkers in CAR T- cell infusion products (IPs) that predict complete remission beyond six months may guide the development of strategies to improve outcomes. Methods.IPs from 13 R/R DLBCL patients were analyzed using a 39-marker mass cytometry panel, comparing cell populations between long-term responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Both unsupervised and supervised analyses were performed. Longitudinal blood samples were analyzed for 30 days to track CAR T-cell subpopulation dynamics. Results.At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.3 months (95% CI: 9.7-24.3) in R (n=8) versus 3.5 months (95% CI: 0.5-5.4) in NR (n=5). The HR for PFS was 56.67 (95% CI: 7.3-439.3; P=0.0001). A subset of CD3+CXCR3+CD7+ CAR T-cells found in both CD4+ and CD8+ populations was significantly enriched in R and expressed higher levels of perforin, granzyme B, and NKG2D (restricted to CD8+). NR had more CXCR3+CD7+LAG3+ CAR T-cells. CD3, CD7, CXCR3, and NKG2D cell surface levels were higher in R, whereas LAG3, Ki67, and CD71 were elevated in NR. A predictive cut-off ratio of CD3+CXCR3+CD7+LAG3+CAR+ T-cells <0.83 and CD3+CXCR3+CD7+NKG2D+CAR+ T-cells >1.034 yielded a predictive accuracy of 0.92. Serum CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels were not different between groups. Conclusions.Increased frequency of CAR T-cells expressing CD7, CXCR3 and NKG2D in R versus LAG3 and CD71 in NR emerged as strong correlates of therapeutic outcome.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
4
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
5
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Haematologica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
11
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
12
Blood Cancer Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
14
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.3%
16
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
19
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
25
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%