Back

Association of CD7⁺CXCR3⁺ CAR T cells with long-term remission in R/R DLBCL

Bartolini, R.; Trueb, L.; Daoudlarian, D.; Joo, V.; Noto, A.; Gentner, B.; Stadelmann, R.; Fenwick, C.; Perreau, M.; Coukos, G.; Pantaleo, G.; Arber, C.; Obeid, M.

2024-12-08 oncology
10.1101/2024.12.06.24318600 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background.CAR T-cell therapy is the standard of care for R/R DLBCL, but more than half of patients fail to achieve long-term remission. Identification of cellular biomarkers in CAR T- cell infusion products (IPs) that predict complete remission beyond six months may guide the development of strategies to improve outcomes. Methods.IPs from 13 R/R DLBCL patients were analyzed using a 39-marker mass cytometry panel, comparing cell populations between long-term responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Both unsupervised and supervised analyses were performed. Longitudinal blood samples were analyzed for 30 days to track CAR T-cell subpopulation dynamics. Results.At a median follow-up of 13.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.3 months (95% CI: 9.7-24.3) in R (n=8) versus 3.5 months (95% CI: 0.5-5.4) in NR (n=5). The HR for PFS was 56.67 (95% CI: 7.3-439.3; P=0.0001). A subset of CD3+CXCR3+CD7+ CAR T-cells found in both CD4+ and CD8+ populations was significantly enriched in R and expressed higher levels of perforin, granzyme B, and NKG2D (restricted to CD8+). NR had more CXCR3+CD7+LAG3+ CAR T-cells. CD3, CD7, CXCR3, and NKG2D cell surface levels were higher in R, whereas LAG3, Ki67, and CD71 were elevated in NR. A predictive cut-off ratio of CD3+CXCR3+CD7+LAG3+CAR+ T-cells <0.83 and CD3+CXCR3+CD7+NKG2D+CAR+ T-cells >1.034 yielded a predictive accuracy of 0.92. Serum CXCL9 and CXCL10 levels were not different between groups. Conclusions.Increased frequency of CAR T-cells expressing CD7, CXCR3 and NKG2D in R versus LAG3 and CD71 in NR emerged as strong correlates of therapeutic outcome.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
4
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
8
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
17
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
22
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
24
Clinical & Translational Immunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%