Back

deepBlastoid: A Deep Learning-Based High-Throughput Classifier for Human Blastoids Using Brightfield Images with Confidence Assessment

Fan, Z.; Li, Z.; Jin, Y.; Chandrasekaran, A. P.; Shakir, I. M.; Zhang, Y.; Siddique, A.; Wang, M.; zhou, X.; Tian, Y.; Wonka, P.; Li, M.

2024-12-09 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.12.05.627041 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances in human blastoids have opened new avenues for modeling early human development and implantation. Human blastoids can be generated in large numbers, making them suitable for high-throughput screening, which often involves analyzing vast numbers of images. However, automated methods for evaluating and characterizing blastoid morphology are still underdeveloped. We developed a deep-learning model capable of recognizing and classifying blastoid brightfield images into five distinct quality categories. The model processes 53.2 images per second with an average accuracy of 87%, without signs of overfitting or batch eHects. By integrating a Confidence Rate (CR) metric, the accuracy was further improved to 97%, with low-CR images flagged for human review. In a comparison with human experts, the model matched their accuracy while significantly outperforming them in throughput. We demonstrate the value of the model in two real-world applications: (1) systematic assessment of the eHect of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) concentration on blastoid formation, and (2) evaluating the impact of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on blastoids for drug screening. In the applications involving over 10,000 images, the model identified significant eHects of LPA and DMSO, which may have been overlooked in manual assessments. The deepBlastoid model is publicly available and researchers can train their own model according to their imaging conditions and blastoid culture protocol. deepBlastoid thus oHers a precise, automated approach for blastoid classification, with significant potential for advancing mechanism research, drug screening, and clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF) applications.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.0%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.3%
3
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
4
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
6
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
7
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
8
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Developmental Dynamics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
11
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.1%
15
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
16
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
18
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.0%
22
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
Science China Life Sciences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Science Bulletin
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
29
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%