A Comparative Study of Muscular, Vestibular, and Haptic Stimulation on Dream Incorporation
Peters, E.; Pohlmann, J.; Wang, X.; Dresler, M.; Erlacher, D.
Show abstract
The connection between the dreamed body and the real physical body remains a subject of ongoing investigation. This study explored how the dreamed body responds to somatosensory stimulation of the physical body, aiming to shed light on the sensory processes that shape our dreaming experiences. We employed a novel within-subject design to compare the incorporation of three different types of bodily stimuli--electrical muscular, galvanic vestibular, and haptic vibration--into dream content, alongside a control sham condition for each stimulus. In total, 24 participants spent one adaptation night, followed by three consecutive test nights in the sleep laboratory. REM awakenings, after sham or stimulation periods, were carried out for dream report collection. In total, 165 dream reports were collected across conditions. While dream incorporation was observed across the three stimulation methods, it occurred equally in both the stimulation and sham conditions for all three modalities. These findings highlight broader methodological challenges in dream incorporation research and raise concerns about potential confounding factors affecting the interpretation of results. Future research with larger sample sizes is needed to detect smaller effect sizes and fully understand the influence of these somatosensory stimuli on dream content. This study employed a rigorous experimental approach to exploring dream incorporation and addressed many methodological challenges in this area. We further suggest areas of improvement to optimize dream incorporation of different sensory modalities. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=164 SRC="FIGDIR/small/626974v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (57K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19dd9cdorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@462ac4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a1b33borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fe0596_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Looking for a reference for large datasets: relative reliability of visual and automatic sleep scoring 93%
- Improving Memory via Automated Targeted Memory Reactivation during Sleep 93%
- Two years after lockdown: longitudinal trajectories of sleep disturbances and mental health over the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of age, gender, and chronotype 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alarm tones, music and their elements: A mixed methods analysis of reported waking sounds for the prevention of sleep inertia. 95%
- Structural differences between REM and non-REM dream reports assessed by graph analysis 95%
- Improved Sleep, Cognitive Processing and Enhanced Learning and Memory Task Accuracy with Yoga Nidra Practice in Novices 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modulating dream experience: Noninvasive brrain stimulation over the sensorimotor cortex reduces dream movement 94%
- Short-Term Meditation Training Alters Brain Activity and Sympathetic Responses at Rest, but not during the meditation 93%
- The relationship between subjective sleep quality and cognitive performance in healthy young adults: Evidence from three empirical studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Dream Catcher experiment: Blinded analyses disconfirm markers of dreaming consciousness in EEG spectral power 91%
- Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Displays Distinct Fractal Dynamics Between Phasic and Tonic States 91%
- Functional connectivity drifts during sleep as a marker of fluctuations in the level of consciousness 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of modern jazz dance on the electrical brain activity 93%
- Mindfulness Training Alters Resting-State EEG Dynamics in Novice Practitioners via Mindful Breathing and Body-scan 92%
- Beauty That Moves: Dance for Parkinson's Effects on Affect, Self-Efficacy, Gait Symmetry and Dual Task Performance 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.