Back

Convergence of autism proteins at the cilium

Kostyanovskaya, E.; Lasser, M. C.; Wang, B.; Schmidt, J.; Bader, E.; Buteo, C.; Arbelaez, J.; Sindledecker, A. R.; McCluskey, K. E.; Castillo, O.; Wang, S.; Dea, J.; Helde, K. A.; Graglia, J. M.; Brimble, E.; Kastner, D. B.; Ehrlich, A. T.; Willsey, A. J.; State, M. W.; Willsey, H. R.

2024-12-05 cell biology
10.1101/2024.12.05.626924 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hundreds of high-confidence autism genes have been identified, yet the relevant etiological mechanisms remain unclear. Gene ontology analyses have repeatedly identified enrichment of proteins with annotated functions in gene expression regulation and neuronal communication. However, proteins are often pleiotropic and these annotations are inherently incomplete. Our recent autism functional genetics work has suggested that these genes may share a common mechanism at the cilium, a membrane-bound organelle critical for neurogenesis, brain patterning, and neuronal activity-all processes strongly implicated in autism. Moreover, autism commonly co-occurs with conditions that are known to involve ciliary-related pathologies, including congenital heart disease, hydrocephalus, and blindness. However, the role of autism genes at the cilium has not been systematically investigated. Here we demonstrate that autism proteins spanning disparate functional annotations converge in expression, localization, and function at cilia, and that patients with pathogenic variants in these genes have cilia-related co-occurring conditions and biomarkers of disrupted ciliary function. This degree of convergence among genes spanning diverse functional annotations strongly suggests that cilia are relevant to autism, as well as to commonly co-occurring conditions, and that this organelle should be explored further for therapeutic potential. One-Sentence SummaryAutism genes of diverse functional annotations converge at cilia, deepening our understanding of underlying autism biology and co-occurring conditions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.