Back

Conservation implications of dietary strategies in the critically endangered Acacia gazelle (Gazella arabica acacia)

Lavie, N.; Levinson, Y.; Rothman, J. M.; Hawlena, D.

2025-02-09 ecology
10.1101/2024.12.05.625804 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animals consume foods in specific quantities and ratios to meet a multi-dimensional nutrient target that maximizes their fitness. Attempts to reach this target in an ever-changing nutritional landscape often influence animal foraging behavior, habitat choice, and food-web interactions. Consequently, understanding the nutritional ecology of a species is instrumental in developing efficient management plans for its conservation. We quantified the dietary considerations of a critically endangered population of Acacia gazelles (Gazella arabica acacia), and compared their diet and nutrition to that of the sympatric Gazella dorcas, using behavioral observations coupled with nutritional and secondary metabolite quantification, and morphological measurements of trees. Acacia gazelles mainly consumed resources from two subspecies of the umbrella-thorn acacia (Vachellia tortilis) that differ in morphology, nutritional composition, and phenology, and prioritized consumption of specific trees based on their nutritional and defensive traits. Gazelles maintained a narrow nutritional target, tightly regulated their protein intake, and prioritized consumption of non-structural carbohydrates. Dorcas gazelles consumed a very different diet from the Acacia gazelle, but converged to a similar intake target. We conclude that suitable habitats for Acacia gazelle reintroduction must include sympatric populations of the two V. tortilis subspecies, that nutritional deficiency is unlikely to play a major role in explaining the slow rate of population recovery, and that the seemingly low competition between the two gazelle species does not necessitate controlling the Dorcas gazelle population. Our work demonstrates the importance of nutritional ecology as a major conservation tool.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.6%
2
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
4
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
5
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
7
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
8
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
10
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.3%
13
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
17
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
18
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
21
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
22
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
23
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
25
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
26
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
27
Biological Invasions
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
28
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
29
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
30
Journal of Avian Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%