Back

Epigenome-wide Association Analysis of Mitochondrial Heteroplasmy Provides Insight into Molecular Mechanisms of Disease

Lai, M.; Kim, K.; Zheng, Y.; Castellani, C.; Ratliff, S. M.; Wang, M.; Liu, X.; Haessler, J.; Huan, T.; Bielak, L. F.; Zhao, W.; Joehanes, R.; Ma, J.; Guo, X.; Manson, J. E.; Grove, M. L.; Bressler, J.; Taylor, K. L.; Lappalainen, T.; Kasela, S.; Blackwell, T.; Lake, N. J.; Faul, J.; Ferrier, K.; Hou, L.; Kooperberg, C.; Reiner, A.; Zhang, K.; Peyser, P. A.; Fornage, M.; Boerwinkle, E.; Raffield, L. M.; Carson, A. P.; Rich, S.; Liu, Y.; Levy, D.; Rotter, J.; Smith, J. A.; Arking, D.; Liu, C.

2024-12-08 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.12.05.24318557 medRxiv
Show abstract

The relationship between mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) heteroplasmy and nuclear DNA (nDNA) methylation (CpGs) remains to be studied. We conducted an epigenome-wide association analysis of heteroplasmy burden scores across 10,986 participants (mean age 77, 63% women, and 54% non-White races/ethnicities) from seven population-based observational cohorts. We identified 412 CpGs (FDR p < 0.05) associated with mtDNA heteroplasmy. Higher levels of heteroplasmy burden were associated with lower nDNA methylation levels at most significant CpGs. Functional inference analyses of genes annotated to heteroplasmy-associated CpGs emphasized mitochondrial functions and showed enrichment in cardiometabolic conditions and traits. We developed CpG-scores based on heteroplasmy-count associated CpGs (MHC-CpG scores) using elastic net Cox regression in a training cohort. A one-unit higher level of the standardized MHC-CpG scores were associated with 1.26-fold higher hazard of all-cause mortality (95% CI: 1.14, 1.39) and 1.09-fold higher hazard of CVD (95% CI: 1.01-1.17) in the meta-analysis of testing cohorts, adjusting for age, sex, and smoking. These findings shed light on the relationship between mtDNA heteroplasmy and DNA methylation, and the role of heteroplasmy-associated CpGs as biomarkers in predicting all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.