Back

Patient-specific hemodynamic markers co-localise with regions of neointimal hyperplasia in an arteriovenous graft

Ninno, F.; Stokes, C.; Aboian, E.; Dardik, A.; Strosberg, D.; Balabani, S.; Diaz, V.

2024-12-08 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.12.05.24318387 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeMost computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies on arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) adopt idealised geometries and simplified boundary conditions (BCs), potentially resulting in misleading conclusions when attempting to predict neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) development. Moreover, they often analyse a limited range of hemodynamic indices, lack validation, and fail to link the graft-altered hemodynamics with follow-up data. This study develops a novel patient-specific CFD workflow for AVGs using pathophysiological BCs. It validates the CFD results with patient medical data and assesses the co-localisation between CFD results and NIH regions at follow-up. MethodsContrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography images were used to segment the patients AVG geometry. A uniform Doppler ultrasound (DUS)-derived velocity profile was imposed at the inlet, and three-element Windkessel models were applied at the arterial outlets of the domain. Transient, rigid-wall simulations were performed using the k-{omega} SST turbulence model. The CFD-derived flow waveform was compared with the patients DUS image to ensure validation. Turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), helicity and near-wall hemodynamic descriptors were calculated and linked with regions presenting NIH from a 4-month follow-up fistulogram. ResultsIn the analysed patient, areas presenting high TKE and balanced helical flow structures at baseline exhibit NIH growth at follow-up. Transverse wall shear stress index is a stronger predictor of NIH than other commonly analysed near-wall hemodynamic indices, since luminal areas subjected to high values greatly co-localise with observed areas of remodelling. ConclusionThis patient-specific computational workflow for AVGs could be applied to a larger cohort to unravel the link between altered hemodynamics and NIH progression in vascular access.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.5%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.6%
13
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
14
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
18
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
27
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%