Back

Identification of potent HSV antivirals using 3D bioprinted human skin equivalents

Ellison, S. T.; Hayman, I.; Derr, K.; Derr, P.; Frebert, S.; Itkin, Z.; Shen, M.; Jones, A.; Olson, W.; Corey, L.; Wald, A.; Johnston, C. M.; Fong, Y.; Ferrer, M.; Zhu, J.

2024-12-09 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.12.04.626896 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection has worldwide public health concerns and lifelong medical impacts. The standard therapy, acyclovir, has limited efficacy in preventing HSV subclinical virus shedding, and drug resistance occurs in immunocompromised patients, highlighting the need for novel therapeutics. HSV manifests in the skin and mucosal epithelium. Here, we found acyclovir significantly less effective in skin-derived keratinocytes than donor-matched fibroblasts. To recapitulate in vivo tissue architecture, we 3D bioprinted human skin equivalents (HSE) in a 96-well plate format amenable for antiviral screening and preclinical testing. We screened a library of 738 compounds with broad targets and mechanisms of action and identified potent antivirals, including 23 known or experimental HSV treatments, validating the translational relevance of our assay. Unlike acyclovir, antivirals against HSV helicase/primase or host replication pathways displayed similar potency across cell types and donor sources in 2D and 3D models. Our 3D bioprinted platform allowed for integrating patient-derived cells and incorporating genetic variability early in drug development. The reduced potency in keratinocytes helps explain the limited benefit acyclovir and its congeners play in reducing sexual transmission. These data indicate that the 3D bioprinted HSE assay platform provides a more physiologically relevant approach to identifying potential antivirals for HSV. One Sentence SummaryHigh-throughput screen using 3D bioprinted human skin equivalents to identify antivirals against HSV and evaluate cell-type specific effects.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.