Back

Comprehensive Longitudinal ctDNA Monitoring in Metastatic Cancer Patients Treated with an Individualized Neoantigen-directed Vaccine

Schenk, D.; Davis, M. J.; Zhou, R.; Mantilla, A.; Galbraith, M.; Spiro, O.; Petrillo, O.; Faria do Valle, I.; Ferguson, A. R.; Jooss, K.; Dhanik, A.

2024-12-07 genomics
10.1101/2024.12.04.626817 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeCirculating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging, minimally invasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for patients receiving a variety of cancer therapies. Comprehensive and robust longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA can provide an understanding of tumor burden, heterogeneity, and response or resistance to treatment. Experimental DesignctDNA of 28 metastatic cancer patients receiving an individualized neoantigen-directed immunotherapy was monitored longitudinally, up to two years, using a unique hybrid next generation sequencing assay targeting tumor-informed and tumor-naive variants. Patient-specific panels were designed targeting an average of 144 variants per patient. A tumor-naive universal panel was also designed for inclusion with patient-specific panels to monitor recurrently mutated tumor hotspots (e.g., KRAS and TP53) and genes implicated in immunotherapy resistance (B2M, TAP1/2). ResultsAnalytical characterization of the assay established linearity with a mean variant allele frequency (VAF) [≥]0.049%, and a variant-level limit of detection (LOD95) of 0.12%. Tumor-informed variants were detected in 26/28 patients, and de novo variants were observed in 25/28 patients. HLA LOH was also observed. Longitudinal ctDNA data provided key insights into patients responses to vaccine treatment. ConclusionsThe hybrid design of the ctDNA monitoring assay provides the sensitivity and specificity required for evaluating patient samples undergoing individualized therapy. It provides an improved capability to understand patient response to experimental therapies and further supports the utility of ctDNA as a cancer biomarker.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.3%
2
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
4
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
7
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
9
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
10
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
14
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.7%
20
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
25
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%