Back

From Pigments to Precision: Exploring Genetic Transformation and Genome Editing in Wheat and Barley

Prusty, M. R.; Shatil-Cohen, A.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, D.; Minz-Dub, A.; Ezrati, S.; Hihinashvili, A.; Sharon, A.

2024-12-06 genomics
10.1101/2024.12.03.626565 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic engineering of wheat is complex due to its large genome size, the presence of numerous genes with high sequence similarities, and a multitude of repetitive elements. In addition, genetic transformation of wheat has been difficult, mainly due to poor regeneration in tissue cultures. Recent advances in plant biotechnology, particularly the use of the regenerative genes GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR (GRF) and GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR (GIF), have provided new tools for wheat transformation and regeneration. Another transformative tool is the RUBY system, that involves genetic engineering of three betalain biosynthesis genes, providing a noninvasive, visually detectable red pigment. In this study, we used the GRF4-GIF1 chimera along with the RUBY system to advance transformation and gene editing in wheat and barley. The GRF4-GIF1 chimera significantly aided wheat regeneration; however, it had an opposite effect in barley, where it inhibited the regeneration process. Therefore, we primarily generated RUBY transgenic barley lines using constructs that did not include the GRF4-GIF1 chimera. Additionally, we used the RUBY cassette for fast assessment of gene editing by knockingout the first betalain biosynthetic gene in RUBY-positive transgenic wheat plants, resulting in a change of leaf color from red to green. The edited RUBY wheat lines lost more than just the red color. They also lost betalain-related traits, such as being less likely to get leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) and salt stress. Importantly, the loss of RUBY did not affect plant viability, making it a useful tool for genome editing and a viable alternative to destructive methods.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
3
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
6
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.2%
8
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Plant Cell Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.5%