Back

Mechanical communication through the ECM is frequency-dependent due to cell sensitivity to mechanical signal shape

Nitsan, I.; Drori, S.; Tzlil, S.

2024-12-05 biophysics
10.1101/2024.12.03.626471 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cells communicate mechanically by sensing and responding to mechanical deformations generated by their neighbors in the extracellular matrix (ECM). By directly measuring the mechanical coupling between a cardiac cell and an artificial mechanical cell and monitoring the dependence of beat-to-beat variability on mechanical coupling, we can quantify the sensitivity of cardiac cells to mechanical signals. Here we show that due to the dynamic viscoelastic properties of collagen hydrogels (a major component of the cardiac ECM), the shape of the mechanical signal changes in a frequency-dependent manner as it propagates through the gel, resulting in mechanical communication that depends on beating frequency. Moreover, we show that cardiac cell sensitivity to the shape of the mechanical signal results from its responsiveness to the loading rate, with an optimal loading rate for efficient mechanical communication. The dependence of signal shape on ECM viscoelasticity and the existence of an optimal loading rate suggest that there are ideal viscoelastic properties for mechanical communication between cardiac cells.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
○ 631 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.6%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Soft Matter
● 60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
5.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
5.6%
Similar papers in this journal
6
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.5%
8
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
9
Acta Biomaterialia
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
10
Physical Review Research
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
11
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.2%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
13
Small
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
○ 233 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
15
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
● 37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
16
The European Physical Journal E
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Cytoskeleton
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Development
● 497 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
19
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
20
Nature Materials
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Materials Today Bio
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
Nano Letters
● 71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.