Back

Engineered human lymph node stroma model for examining interstitial fluid flow and T cell egress

Hammel, J. H.; Arneja, A.; Cunningham, J.; Wang, M.; Schumaecker, S.; Orihuela, Y. M.; Ozulumba, T.; Zatorski, J.; Braciale, T. J.; Luckey, C. J.; Pompano, R. R.; Munson, J. M.

2024-12-07 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.12.03.622729 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The lymph node (LN) performs essential roles in immunosurveillance throughout the body. Developing in vitro models of this key tissue is of great importance to enhancing physiological relevance in immunoengineering. The LN consists of stromal populations and immune cells, which are highly organized and bathed in constant interstitial flow. The stroma, notably the fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) and the lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs), play crucial roles in guiding T cell migration and are known to be sensitive to fluid flow. During inflammation, interstitial fluid flow rates drastically increase in the LN. It is unknown how these altered flow rates impact crosstalk and cell behavior in the LN, and most existing in vitro models focus on the interactions between T cells, B cells, and dendritic cells rather than with the stroma. To address this gap, we developed a human engineered model of the LN stroma consisting of FRC-laden hydrogel above a monolayer of LECs in a tissue culture insert with gravity-driven interstitial flow. We found that FRCs had enhanced coverage and proliferation in response to high flow rates, while LECs experienced decreased barrier integrity. We added CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and found that their egress was significantly decreased in the presence of interstitial flow, regardless of magnitude. Interestingly, 3.0 {micro}m/s flow, but not 0.8 {micro}m/s flow, correlated with enhanced inflammatory cytokine secretion in the LN stroma. Overall, we demonstrate that interstitial flow is an essential consideration in the lymph node for modulating LN stroma morphology, T cell migration, and inflammation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
7
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
9
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
11
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
12
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
13
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
23
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
27
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%