Back

Willingness to pay for COVID-19 vaccine and its correlates: A cross-sectional survey in Bangladesh

Hossain, M. B.; Alam, M. Z.; Islam, M. S.; Sultan, S.; Faysal, M. M.; Rima, S.; Hossain, M. A.; Mamun, A. A.; Mamun, A.- A.-

2024-12-06 health economics
10.1101/2024.12.03.24318442 medRxiv
Show abstract

The Government of Bangladesh has offered COVID-19 vaccines at no cost; however, sustaining this free vaccination program for a large population poses significant challenges. Assessing willingness to pay (WTP) is essential for understanding potential pricing strategies, subsidy requirements, and vaccine demand. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of WTP for COVID-19 vaccines and identify its influencing factors to support program sustainability. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 1,497 respondents through online, and face-to-face interviews and multiple logistic regression was employed to analyze the correlates of WTP. Results showed that 50.9% of participants were willing to pay, with an average WTP of 754.55 BDT (US$8.93) and a median of 300 BDT (US$3.55). WTP was significantly higher among individuals with graduate (aOR=2.2, P=0.007) or Masters & MPhil/PhD education (aOR=2, P=0.030), higher family income (aOR=1, P=0.039), and those with more excellent knowledge about the vaccine (aOR=1.1, P=0.003), positive behavioral practices (aOR=1.1, P<0.001), stronger subjective norms (aOR=1.2, P=0.009), higher anticipated regret (aOR=1.2, P=0.005), and perceived benefits (aOR=1.1, P=0.029). Conversely, WTP was lower among participants with negative attitudes toward vaccines (aOR=0.9, P<0.001) and high behavioral control (aOR=0.9, P=0.006). With nearly half of respondents unwilling to pay, the study highlights the need to improve vaccine-related knowledge, promote positive behaviors, reduce vaccine hesitancy, and enhance income-based affordability to increase WTP. Health promotion efforts should focus on disseminating vaccine knowledge and addressing negative perceptions. Additionally, a subsidized program for low-income groups could help mitigate financial barriers and promote equitable vaccine access.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.4%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.3%
3
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
7
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
10
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
18
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
19
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%