Validation of the Teamwork Perceptions Survey in the Operating Theatre
Fahey-Williams, K. H.; Weller, J. M.; Long, J. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundTeamwork is recognised as a vital factor in patient safety, and as such we need valid measurement tools to drive change. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the Teamwork Perceptions Survey as a measure of staff perceptions of the functional and relational components of teamwork and leadership in the operating theatre. MethodsThe authors developed a 24-item questionnaire, aligned with the goals of a national team training intervention. The Teamwork Perceptions Survey was administered to New Zealand public hospital operating theatre staff before and after a hospital commencing the intervention. These scores were used to explore the psychometric properties of the tool, using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Results2409 (1233 pre- and 176 post-intervention respondents) completed the Teamwork Perceptions Survey. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 3 factors (6 items, communication and shared mental model; 6 items, leadership and role modelling; 5 items, trust and accountability) and resulted in dropping 5 redundant items. The final 17-item, three factor solution was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis, revealing satisfactory goodness of fit. Cronbachs alpha was high for the full survey ( = 0.947), and each subscale (communication, = 0.887; leadership, 6 items, = 0.911; trust, = 0.872). ConclusionsThese data provide evidence to support the validity and reliability of the Teamwork Perceptions Survey as a measure of staff perceptions of teamwork and leadership in the operating theatre. This new measurement tool for the functional and relational components of teamwork and leadership in the operating theatre has the potential for both measuring and driving quality improvement initiatives in teamwork and patient safety. SummaryO_LIWhat is already known on this topic - Whilst there are a number of established teamwork measurement tools, many completed by an external observer, or do not adequately address the unique operating theatre environment. C_LIO_LIWhat this study adds - This study supports the validity and reliability of a new measure of staff perceptions of the functional and relational components of teamwork and leadership in the operating theatre. It fills a previous gap in available measures in that it is self-completed and is designed for the operating theatre environment. C_LIO_LIHow this study might affect research, practice or policy - The Teamwork Perceptions Survey has the potential for both measuring and driving quality improvement initiatives in teamwork and patient safety in surgical practice. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiotherapy Under Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study on The Interplay Between Perfectionism, Moral Injury, and Burnout 95%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 95%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
- Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 91%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 91%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 92%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 92%
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and psychometric testing of EPAT-16: A short and valid measure for patient-centeredness from the patient’s perspective 94%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
- Perspectives of Researchers and Clinicians on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: An Interview Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.