Back

CancerSpot: A multi-cancer early detection test developed and validated on a retrospective cohort

Basu, S.; Hiremath, P.; Rathod, N.; Chatterjee, A.; Vishwanath, D.; Ghosh, A.; Sanguri, S.; Chakraborty, S.; Tripathi, A.; RT, P.; Nair, A.; Kumar, G.; Sekar, K.; Yete, S.; G, B.; Bahadur, U.; Radhakrishnan, A.; Khan, A.; Kannan S, Y.; Bollipalli, L.; Ghana, P.; Ramanathan, A.; Saha, P.; Phalke, S.; Cantor, C.; Limaye, S.; Chandru, V.; Veeramachaneni, V.; Hariharan, R.

2024-12-05 oncology
10.1101/2024.12.03.24318395 medRxiv
Show abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have transformed biomarker discovery, enabling the detection of disease-associated markers at the earliest stages of illness. In this study, we introduce a blood-based, non-invasive test for multi-cancer detection using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation sequencing. The test employs a novel methylation scoring system derived from sequencing data and integrates machine learning to analyze a retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed cancer cases and controls recruited from multiple centers across India. To enhance robustness, the study includes a substantial proportion of controls with habitual tobacco and alcohol use, ensuring the tests resilience against confounding factors. The tests accuracy was further validated through synthetic data augmentation, demonstrating reliability under conditions of random signal perturbation. At an approximate specificity of 97%, the assay achieves sensitivities of 79.3% for Stage I, 78.4% for Stage II, 78.4% for Stage III, and 86.8% for Stage IV cancers in an independent validation cohort. Additionally, the test demonstrates Top 2 Tissue of Origin (TOO) accuracies of 78.3% for Stage I, 79.3% for Stage II, 82.8% for Stage III, and 69.7% for Stage IV cancers. This blood-based test holds considerable promise for early cancer detection, offering a precise test for cancer screening.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.9%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
9
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
11
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
12
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
14
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
22
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
26
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%