ROSLT: An Improved Raspberry-Pi Open-Source Live Voluntary-Wheel Running Tracker Method and Resource
Sanosa, P.; Marrow, J. P.; Malicki, A. R.; Brunt, K. R.; Simpson, J. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundExercise promotes health and has therapeutic effects on disease. Over time, the body improves its maximal exercise capacity through training adaptations such as an increase in VO2 max. In mice, voluntary wheel running allows for a natural setting to test spontaneous running behaviour under non-stressed conditions. There is a need to design sensitive animal-based assay that improves resolution for differentiating exercise performance from a regular cyclometer (which presents a single value from a summary of dynamic data collected over time) and offer circadian analyses. The purpose of this work is to examine the exercise behaviours of mice with a focus on circadian rhythm of running. We hypothesize the pi cyclometer (ROSLT) will mirror VDO M2.1 behaviors, enhancing circadian rhythm insights. MethodsUsing a hand-built cyclometer programmed through the Raspberry Pi computer, voluntary wheel running behaviours in CD-1 mice ([~]8-10 weeks) were recorded for 6 consecutive days. This features a Hall Effect sensor and neodymium magnets attached on the running wheels that will detect changes to wheel rotation, speed, acceleration, and distance (continuously) and publish the data to a server in real-time. To compare capabilities, running wheels will also be equipped with the VDO M2.1 WR Cycling Computer to track distance which will be manually recorded once a day. Accuracy from both devices were mechanically validated. ResultsThe main findings include that voluntary wheel running distance over 6 days produces inaccuracies by the VDO. The VDO showed fluctuations in distance over the last 3 days, while ROSLT showed consistent measurements. ConclusionThis comparison shows that ROSLT expands on the running activity of mice each day while maintaining accuracy and precision. This novel dynamic circadian cyclometer will advance our research abilities and can be used in differentiating exercise performance in applications such as doping.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated, Stress-Free, and Precise Measurement of Songbird Weight in Neuroscience Experiments 94%
- Within-subjects ultra-short sleep-wake protocol for characterising circadian variations in retinal function 93%
- Comparison of raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph, Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit using a mechanical shaker table 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenStride: an inexpensive, open-source force plate actometry system for quantification of rodent motor activity and behaviour 94%
- Multimodal characterization of Yucatan minipig behavior and physiology through maturation 93%
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in player position running velocity at lactate thresholds among male professional German soccer players 91%
- Comparing algorithms for assessing upper limb use with inertial measurement units 90%
- Effective Assessments of a Short-duration Poor Posture on Upper Limb Muscle Fatigue before Physical Exercise 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- O mouse, where art thou? The Mouse Position Surveillance System (MoPSS) - an RFID based tracking system 96%
- My friend MIROSLAV: A Hackable Open-Source Hardware and Software Platform for High-Throughput Rodent Activity Monitoring in the Home Cage 94%
- Visual Field Analysis: a reliable method to score left- and right eye-use using automated tracking 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- REVS: A New Open-Source Platform for High-Resolution Analysis of Rodent Wheel Running Behavior 96%
- ReachingBot: an automated and scalable benchtop device for highly parallel Single Pellet Reach-and-Grasp training and assessment in mice 94%
- RTFED, an open-source versatile tool for home-cage monitoring of behaviour and fibre photometry recording in mice 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.