Back

Human-immune-system humanized-DRAGA mice are a valuable model to study novel immunotherapies for HIV-1

Pumtang-on, P.; Goodarzi, N.; Davey, B. C.; Sevcik, E. N.; Coleman-Fuller, N.; Vezys, V.; Rao, M.; Pampusch, M. S.; Rendahl, A. K.; Casares, S. A.; Skinner, P. J.

2024-12-05 immunology
10.1101/2024.12.02.626442 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humanized (h)DRAGA mice are a promising in vivo model for investigating immunotherapies for treating HIV infections. These mice are not only susceptible to HIV infection, but they also develop functional human immune cells, including T cells and B cells as well as follicular-like structures that mimic lymphoid B cell follicles, where HIV-producing cells concentrate during infection in a manner similar to that found in humans. This study evaluated the safety, tissue targeting, and efficacy of follicular-targeting HIV-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells (CAR/CXCR5-T cells) in HIV-infected hDRAGA mice. Intravenously-infused CAR/CXCR5-T cells persisted in hDRAGA mice for the duration of the study, peaking six days post-infusion. This study indicated that CAR/CXCR5-T cell treatment is safe, with 100% survival rate of treated mice and no noticeable changes in pathology. Six days after infusion, CAR/CXCR5-T cells had accumulated in the follicle-like structures, with many appearing in direct contact with HIV-producing cells. However, CAR/CXCR5-T cell treatment did not appear to reduce viral loads compared to controls, perhaps because many of the engineered CAR/CXCR5-T cells were themselves infected with HIV, with some CAR/CXCR5-T cells showing evidence of HIV virion release. Future studies will investigate whether CAR/CXCR5-T cells engineered for resistance against HIV infection are effective in reducing viral loads. This study supports the approach of using the HIV-infected hDRAGA mouse model to test cellular immunotherapies for HIV, as the model recapitulates many aspects of HIV infection in human lymphoid follicles.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.