A simplified risk model for pretreatment stratification of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine
Islam, N.; Reuben, J. S.; Dale, J. L.; Zhang, J.; Coates, J. W.; Sapiah, K.; Markson, F. R.; Wu, L.; Kulkarni, U. V.; Boyiadzis, M.; Smith, C. A.
Show abstract
Venetoclax plus azacitidine (ven/aza) is a new standard of care for adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients who are not candidates for intensive therapies. Risk stratification approaches have been proposed to identify patients with favorable, intermediate, and adverse therapeutic outcomes following ven/aza and other lower intensive therapies. However, most have been developed for retrospective data analyses and have limitations in their application to upfront risk stratification of newly diagnosed patients. Here, we describe an AML risk model, termed the Refined Risk Model (RRM), that is specific for ven/aza, addresses important real-world considerations and utilizes pathology features that have the potential to be available relatively quickly-and-broadly following diagnosis. The RRM was developed and internally validated using a single center cohort of 316 AML patients from the University of Colorado treated upfront with ven/aza, and then externally validated on an AML cohort from a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified AML database. The RRM effectively stratified patients into Adverse, Intermediate, and Favorable groups across both the internal and external cohorts; it performed well in subsets with or without allogeneic transplant recipients, demonstrated tolerance to missing data, and showed numerical performance comparable to or exceeding the existing alternatives such as the European Leukemia Network (ELN 2022) and molecular prognostic risk signature (mPRS) models. These findings suggest that the RRM may have potential application in defining the prognostic mortality risk for newly diagnosed AML patients, which may help guide clinical trial design and execution as well as other important elements of AML clinical decision support.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal Spatial Proteomic Profiling in Acute Myeloid Leukemia 93%
- Mutated clones driving leukemic transformation are already detectable at the single cell level in CD34-positive cells in the chronic phase of primary myelofibrosis 93%
- Multimodal classification of molecular subtypes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping AML heterogeneity – multi-cohort transcriptomic analysis identifies novel clusters and divergent ex-vivo drug responses 94%
- Resistance to decitabine and 5-azacytidine emerges from adaptive responses of the pyrimidine metabolism network 93%
- Combining LSD1 and JAK-STAT inhibition targets Down syndrome-associated myeloid leukemia at its core 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leukemia stemness and co-occurring mutations drive resistance to IDH inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia 93%
- Cas9-AAV6 Gene Correction of Beta-Globin in Autologous HSCs Improves Sickle Cell Disease Erythropoiesis in Mice 92%
- In vivo inducible reverse genetics in patients' tumors to identify individual therapeutic targets 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Blinatumomab-driven T-cell activation in αβ and γδ T-cell subsets: Insights from in vitro assays 92%
- Dental biofilm microbiota dysbiosis is associated with the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 92%
- Leukemic mutation FLT3-ITD is retained in dendritic cells and disrupts their homeostasis leading to expanded Th17 frequency 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-Cell Atlas of AML Reveals Age-Related Gene Regulatory Networks in t(8;21) AML 93%
- COMPARE, an ultra-fast and robust suite for multiparametric screening, identifies phenotypic drug responses in acute myeloid leukemia 93%
- Convergent Epigenetic Evolution Drives Relapse in Acute Myeloid Leukemia 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.