Frequency dynamics predict viral fitness, antigenic relationships and epidemic growth
Figgins, M. D.; Bedford, T.
Show abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 variants drove large waves of infections, fueled by increased transmissibility and immune escape. Current models focus on changes in variant frequencies without linking them to underlying transmission mechanisms of intrinsic transmissibility and immune escape. We introduce a frame-work connecting variant dynamics to these mechanisms, showing how host population immunity interacts with viral transmissibility and immune escape to determine relative variant fitness. We advance a selective pressure metric that provides an early signal of epidemic growth using genetic data alone, crucial with current underreporting of cases. Additionally, we show that a latent immunity space model approximates immunological distances, offering insights into population susceptibility and immune evasion. These insights refine real-time forecasting and lay the groundwork for research into the interplay between viral genetics, immunity, and epidemic growth.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune Heterogeneity and Epistasis Explain Punctuated Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 96%
- Dynamics of COVID-19 under social distancing measures are driven by transmission network structure 96%
- Phenotypic delay in the evolution of bacterial antibiotic resistance: mechanistic models and their implications 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting in vivo escape dynamics of HIV-1 from a broadly neutralizing antibody 97%
- Joint nonparametric coalescent inference of mutation spectrum history and demography 96%
- Quantifying Asymptomatic Infection and Transmission of COVID-19 in New York City using Observed Cases, Serology and Testing Capacity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.