Back

Comparative forewing ultrastructure of high-frequency singing crickets (Eneopterinae)

ROYER, L.; Gaiddon, T.; Robillard, T.

2024-12-05 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.12.01.625810 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Male crickets belonging to the tribe Lebinthini (Eneopterinae) produce high-frequency, sometimes ultrasonic, calling songs characterized by a dominant harmonic frequency -a phenomenon known as harmonic hopping. While cricket sound production is well understood, the mechanism allowing the dominant frequency to move to the harmonics of the spectrum is little studied. The wing region known as the harp corresponds to the primary resonator of the cricket tegmina. Here we hypothesize that the surface ultrastructure of this region could play a role in the physical properties of the wings and in their vibratory behavior. In this study, we used scanning electron microscopy to explore the diversity of wing membrane ultrastructure in the harp region of 33 species of Eneopterinae, including species producing both low-frequency and high-frequency calling songs. We highlighted a great diversity of ultrastructure within the subfamily. We defined and measured 5 morphological traits concerning the hexagonal cells visible on the dorsal face of the wing, and the microtrichia, filiform sensory structures present on the ventral face. Significant differences are found in hexagonal cell size and density between males and females, and between the males of the species of the Lebinthini tribe and the non-Lebinthini species. These results suggest a link between the presence of these hexagonal structures and the song frequency value. Surfacic structures could play a role in the stiffening of the wing, a property directly related to vibration frequency of the wing. The observation of these structure and more precisely their size and distribution between high-frequency songs producing species and Low-frequency species constitute a new avenue for the understanding of harmonic-hoppings in Lebinthini crickets.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
4
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.5%
15
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
21
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
22
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
26
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%