Flow transport and not ejection fraction determines left ventricular stasis in patients with impaired systolic function
Martinez-Legazpi, P.; Bermejo, J.; del Alamo, J. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundImpaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function is a major risk factor for mural thrombosis and embolism, but LV ejection fraction (EF) poorly predicts these events, suggesting the existence of additional sources of variability. Advances in multi-dimensional flow imaging and patient-specific simulations have sparked the derivation of diverse metrics to assess blood stasis and transit efficiency. However, simple models to interpret these metrics and their dependence on chamber function are lacking. MethodsWe introduce queue models of LV blood transit connecting two common metrics of LV efficiency: flow component analysis and residence time (RT) mapping. These models yield closed-form expressions for the average RT of blood in the LV as a function of EF, direct flow (DF) --blood entering and leaving the LV in one cardiac cycle, and residual volume (RV) -- blood persisting in the LV for >2 cycles. Models performance was tested against RT obtained from vector flow mapping in 332 subjects, including controls and patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hypertrophic (HCM) and dilated (DCM) cardiomyopathy. ResultsQueue models revealed RT is increasingly sensitive to DF as EF decreases, contradicting the traditional view of large DF as a teleological advantage. Instead, RT is minimized when blood transits in a first-in-first-out (FIFO) manner, while DF short-circuits the FIFO pattern, prolonging RT for other flow components. FIFO models show a good performance to assess RT in the studied subjects, especially when accounting for patient-specific DF and RV, with R: 0.62 for the pooled data, 0.70 for control, and 0.60, 0.80 and 0.40 for AMI, DCM and HCM groups respectively. ConclusionBy developing queue models of LV blood transit, and testing them on a large clinical database, we show large DF may contribute to increased blood stasis when EF is low. These models also explain why EF is a poor thrombosis risk marker in AMI and DCM.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Ventricular Tachycardia Circuits in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy using Genotype-specific Heart Digital Twins 93%
- Vein fate determined by flow-based but time-delayed integration of network architecture 92%
- Personalized Computational Modeling Identifies Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Patients with Potential Arrhythmic Substrate 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multiscale model of the cardiovascular system that regulates arterial pressure via closed loop baroreflex control of chronotropism, cell-level contractility, and vascular tone 94%
- A fast computational model for circulatory dynamics:Effects of left ventricle-aorta coupling 94%
- Modeling cardiac microcirculation for the simulation of coronary flow and 3D myocardial perfusion 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced gap junction coupling amplifies the effects of cardiomyocyte variability and destabilizes the heartbeat 92%
- Positive Rate Dependent Action Potential Prolongation By Modulating Potassium Ion Channels 90%
- Multichannel Modulation of Depolarizing and Repolarizing Ion Currents Increases the Positive Rate Dependence of Action Potential Prolongation 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.