Untangling the contribution of adaptive versus non-adaptive processes in the evolution of reproductive isolation between Coenonympha butterflies.
Capblancq, T.; Roux, C.; Boyer, F.; Legeai, F.; Joron, M.; Despres, L.
Show abstract
Speciation is a key evolutionary process which has been studied in numerous organisms and at multiple scales, from lineage radiation to gene expression. However, the factors explaining the rise of new species are not yet fully understood, and the relative contribution of neutral versus selective evolutionary processes in triggering and maintaining reproductive isolation between lineages is still debated. To explore this question, we study the divergence of two butterfly species, Coenonympha arcania and C. gardetta (Nymphalidae), which diverged relatively recently but show strong ecological differences. Whole genome sequence data reveal high overall differentiation between the two lineages, best explained by a long period of isolation at the early stage of their divergence. Demographically explicit approaches identify that 6.6% of the genome (32.7 Mbp) is impermeable to gene flow between the two species. Lots of these barrier loci are located on the Z chromosome, potentially spanning 75% of its length which would indicate that a large Z effect is at play in this speciation. Moreover, only a small proportion of barriers showed signatures of selection, suggesting that non-adaptive processes largely contributed to the build-up of reproductive isolation. Therefore, although genes involved in stress response and response to hypoxia are interesting candidates under selection, the adaptation of C. gardetta to alpine conditions may not to be the main driver of speciation. Our study brings an original example of intertwined adaptive and non-adaptive processes leading to reproductive isolation in a speciation with secondary contact and improves our understanding of the genomic underpinnings of species divergence.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sustained plumage divergence despite weak genomic differentiation and broad sympatry in sister species of Australian woodswallows (Artamus spp.) 98%
- Population genomics of adaptive radiations: Exceptionally high levels of genetic diversity and recombination in an endemic spider from the Canary Islands 97%
- Population genomic evidence of selection on structural variants in a natural hybrid zone 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Selection shapes the genomic landscape of introgressed ancestry in a pair of sympatric sea urchin species 97%
- Chromosomal inversions and the demography of speciation in Drosophila montana and Drosophila flavomontana 97%
- The effects of GC-biased gene conversion on patterns of genetic diversity among and across butterfly genomes 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for ancient selective sweeps followed by differentiation among three species of Sphyrapicus sapsuckers 97%
- Genetic sex determination in three closely related hydrothermal vent gastropods, including one species with intersex individuals 95%
- Temporal genomics help in deciphering neutral and adaptive patterns in the contemporary evolution of kelp populations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introgression between highly divergent sea squirt genomes: an adaptive breakthrough? 97%
- Unraveling genetic load dynamics during biological invasion: insights from two invasive insect species 96%
- Evolution of immune genes in island birds: reduction in population sizes can explain island syndrome 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population structure limits parallel evolution 97%
- Comparative population genomics unveils congruent secondary suture zone in Southwest Pacific Hydrothermal Vents 96%
- A whole-genome scan for association with invasion success in the fruit fly Drosophila suzukii using contrasts of allele frequencies corrected for population structure 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.