Neonatal amygdala microstructure and structural connectivity are associated with autistic traits at 2 years of age
Vaher, K.; Neal, S. R.; Blesa Cabez, M.; Jimenez-Sanchez, L.; Corrigan, A.; Stoye, D. Q.; Turner, H. L.; Smikle, R.; Cruickshank, H.; Rudnicka, M.; Bastin, M. E.; Thrippleton, M. J.; Reynolds, R. M.; Boardman, J. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundPrenatal exposure to maternal stress is linked to behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood. Maternal hair cortisol concentration in pregnancy associates with neonatal amygdala microstructure and structural connectivity ascertained from MRI, suggesting that amygdala development is sensitive to the impact of antenatal stress via hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Here, we investigate whether amygdala microstructure and/or connectivity associate with neurodevelopment at 2 years of age. Methods174 participants (105 very preterm) underwent brain MRI at term-equivalent age and assessment of neurodevelopment, autistic traits, temperament, and executive function at 2 years corrected age. We calculated diffusion tensor imaging and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging metrics for left and right amygdalae. Structural connectivity was measured by mean fractional anisotropy from the amygdalae to 6 ipsilateral regions of interest (insula, putamen, thalamus, inferior temporal gyrus, medial orbitofrontal cortex, rostral anterior cingulate cortex). We used linear regression to model amygdala-outcome associations, adjusting for gestational age at birth and at scan, sex, maternal education, and maternal postnatal depression score. Network-based statistics (NBS) was used for a whole-brain analysis. ResultsAfter adjusting for multiple comparisons, lower amygdala mean diffusivity bilaterally (left: {beta}=-0.32, p=0.026, right: {beta}=-0.38, p=0.012), higher left amygdala neurite density index ({beta}=0.35, p=0.026), and increased left amygdala-putamen connectivity ({beta}=0.31, p=0.026) associated with higher autistic traits. NBS revealed amygdala-involving networks associated with cognition and surgency temperament trait among preterm infants. Other neurodevelopmental outcomes did not significantly associate with amygdala imaging features. ConclusionsMicrostructural variation in the neonatal amygdala may be important in the development of autistic traits.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional connectivity in the social perception pathway at birth is linked with attention to faces at 4 months 95%
- Sex-specific effects of early life unpredictability on hippocampal and amygdala responses to novelty in adolescents 94%
- Dynamic Resting-State Network Markers of Disruptive Behavior Problems in Youth 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Replicability of Structural Brain Alterations Associated with General Psychopathology: Evidence from a Population-Representative Birth Cohort 94%
- Connectome dysfunction in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis and modulation by oxytocin 94%
- Pre-treatment clinical behavioral and blood leukocyte gene expression patterns predict rate of change in response to early intervention in autism 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parsing brain-behavior heterogeneity in very preterm born children using integrated similarity networks 98%
- Maternal depressive symptoms, neonatal white matter, and toddler social-emotional development 96%
- Neural Correlates of Positive and Negative Valence System Dysfunction in Adolescents Revealed by Data-Driven Parcellation and Resting-State Network Modeling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subtle alterations in neonatal neurodevelopment following early or late exposure to prenatal maternal immune activation 94%
- Reduced fronto-striatal volume in ADHD in two cohorts across the lifespan 93%
- Clarifying the role of Cortico-Cortical and Amygdalo-Cortical brain dysconnectivity associated with Conduct Problems 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.