Back

Identification of disease-specific extracellular vesicle-associated plasma protein biomarkers for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy

Bayazit, M. B.; Henderson, D.; Nguyen, K. T.; Reategui, E.; Tawil, R.; Flanigan, K. M.; Harper, S. Q.; Saad, N. Y.

2024-11-30 neurology
10.1101/2024.11.29.24317861
Show abstract

ObjectiveReliable, circulating biomarkers for Duchenne, Becker and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophies (DBMD and FSHD) remain unvalidated. Here, we investigated the plasma extracellular vesicle (EV) proteome to identify disease-specific biomarkers that could accelerate therapy approvals. MethodsWe extracted EVs from the plasma of DBMD and FSHD patients and healthy controls using size-exclusion chromatography, conducted mass spectrometry on the extracted EV proteins, and performed comparative analysis to identify disease-specific biomarkers. We correlated the levels of these biomarkers with clinical outcome measures and confounding factors. ResultsThe muscle-associated proteins PYGM, MYOM3, FLNC, MYH2 and TTN were exclusively present in DBMD EVs. PYGM, MYOM3, and TTN negatively correlated with age. PYGM and MYOM3 levels were elevated in patients without cardiomyopathy, and PYGM levels were specifically elevated in ambulatory DMD patients. On the other hand, female FSHD patients displayed significantly higher MBL2 and lower GPLD1 levels. However, male FSHD patients exhibited higher C9 and lower C4BPB levels. Additionally, desmosome proteins JUP and DSP were uniquely found in FSHD males. MBL2 positively correlated with age and C4BPB negatively correlated with FSHD severity in male patients. InterpretationOur findings underscore the sensitivity of analyzing circulating EV content to identify disease-specific protein biomarkers for DBMD and FSHD. Our results also emphasize the potential of EV-based biomarker discovery as a promising approach to monitor disease progression as well as effectiveness of therapies in muscular dystrophy, potentially contributing to their approval. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to validate these biomarkers and explore their clinical implications.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Movement Disorders
based on 49 papers
Top 0.8%
14.1%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 6%
13.8%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 61%
6.8%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 0.4%
5.4%
5
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 0.4%
3.1%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 19%
3.1%
7
Acta Neuropathologica
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Arthritis & Rheumatology
based on 21 papers
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 8%
1.7%
12
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
14
European Journal of Neurology
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 5%
1.4%
16
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Med
based on 26 papers
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Annals of Neurology
based on 43 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
20
EMBO Molecular Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
24
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 27%
0.8%
25
npj Parkinson's Disease
based on 35 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
27
EBioMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
based on 23 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.7%