Back

Safeguarding Iguana diversity: Enabling rapid and low-effort tracking of non-native iguanas through terrestrial eDNA innovations

Kuijk, J.; van den Burg, M.; Didaskalou, E.; de Boer, M.; Debrot, A.; Wielstra, B.; Stewart, K. A.

2024-12-03 ecology
10.1101/2024.11.28.625859 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reptiles have among the highest extinction risk across terrestrial vertebrates, with habitat fragmentation, habitat destruction, and invasive alien species being the primary causes of reptile species loss on a global scale. Invasive hybridization (i.e. hybridization between native and invasive alien species) is increasing globally, causing the extinction of native genotypes, and this phenomenon is particularly pervasive in Caribbean iguanas. The Lesser Antillean Iguana (Iguana delicatissima), a keystone species of Caribbean coastal ecosystems, has become critically endangered mainly due to ongoing hybridization with the invasive Common Green Iguana (I. iguana). For impactful conservation intervention, the need for early detection of invasive animals and their progeny, or detection of surviving pure native animals, is urgent. We aimed to develop a novel environmental DNA (eDNA) toolkit using Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) technology, a method of allele-specific amplification for cost-effective and efficient sampling of terrestrial substrates to aid in mapping the distribution of native I. delicatissima, invasive I. iguana, and signal potential invasive hybridization. We demonstrate proof-of-concept and successfully identified I. delicatissima, I. iguana, and their hybrids via blood samples using our primer sets, as well as successful detection of I. delicatissima in several ex-situ (Rotterdam Zoo) and in-situ (St. Eustatius) eDNA samples, collected with environmental swabs and tape-lifting. We found that sampling potential perching spots yielded the highest number of positive detections via environmental swabbing and tape-lifting. Our toolkit demonstrates the potential of terrestrial eDNA sampling for iguana conservation, enabling faster detection of potential invasive hybridization. Additionally, the method holds promise for other terrestrial cryptic species, contributing to broader collection of population-level information.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.6%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
6
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.6%
9
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
12
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
16
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%