Back

Cell type-Specific In Vivo Proteomes with a Multi-copy Mutant Methionyl t-RNA Synthetase Mouse Line

Schuman, E. M.; Alvarez Pardo, R.; tom Dieck, S.; Desch, K.; Nassim Assir, B.; Olmedo Salinas, C.; Sivakumar, R.; Langer, J. D.; Alvarez-Castelao, B.

2024-12-02 cell biology
10.1101/2024.11.28.625838 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The functional diversity of cells is driven by the different proteins they express. While improvements in protein labeling techniques have allowed for the measurement of proteomes with increased sensitivity, measuring cell type-specific proteomes in vivo remains challenging. One of the most useful pipelines is bioorthogonal non-canonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT) with the MetRS* system, consisting of a transgenic mouse line expressing a mutant methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS*) controlled by Cre recombinase expression. This system allows for cell type-specific labeling of proteins with a non-canonical amino acid (azidonorleucine, ANL), which can be subsequently conjugated to affinity or fluorescent tags using click chemistry. Click-modified proteins can then be visualized, purified and identified. The reduction in sample complexity allows for the detection of small changes in protein composition. Here we describe a multicopy MetRS* mouse line (3xMetRS* mouse line), which exhibits markedly enhanced ANL protein labeling, boosting the sensitivity and temporal resolution of the system and eliminating the need for working under methionine depletion conditions. Cell type-specific in vivo labeling is possible even in heterozygous animals, thus offering an enormous advantage for crossing the line into mutation and disease-specific backgrounds. Using the 3xMetRS* line we identified the in vivo proteome of a sparse cell population - the dopaminergic neurons of the olfactory bulb and furthermore determined newly synthesized proteins after short labeling durations following a single intraperitoneal ANL injection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.