Tackling the Complexity of Spatial Transcriptomics Data Interpretation with Large Language Models
Khan, T.; Farley, C. M.; Wilson, J. J.; Chang, C.-H.; Chaussabel, D.
Show abstract
Spatial transcriptomics offers unprecedented insights into the complex cellular landscapes of tissues, particularly in cancer research where understanding the tumor microenvironment is crucial. However, interpreting the vast and intricate data generated by this technology remains a significant challenge. This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist in the analysis and interpretation of spatial transcriptomic data from a murine melanoma tumor model. We first evaluated the performance of multiple LLM models in describing and quantifying spatial gene expression patterns. Our benchmarking revealed that spatial transcriptomics data interpretation proved challenging for most models, with only a few demonstrating sufficient capability for this complex task. Using Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed the highest accuracy in spot quantification and pattern recognition, we developed a systematic workflow for analyzing the tumor immune landscape. The model first assisted in identifying and prioritizing panels of M1 and M2 macrophage-associated markers through knowledge-driven scoring. It then demonstrated remarkable ability to integrate spatial expression data with extensive immunological knowledge, providing sophisticated interpretation of local immune organization. When analyzing individual tumor regions, the model identified coordinated immunosuppressive mechanisms including metabolic barriers and disrupted pro-inflammatory signaling cascades, findings that both aligned with and extended current understanding of tumor immunology. This study highlights the potential of LLMs as powerful assistive tools in spatial transcriptomics analysis, capable of combining advanced pattern recognition with extensive knowledge integration to enhance data interpretation. While significant development work remains to make such workflows scalable, our proof of concept demonstrates that LLMs can help accelerate the translation of spatial transcriptomics data into biological insights.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting GD2 expression across cancer types by the integration of pathway topology and transcriptome data 93%
- Integrated Multi-Optosis Model for Pan-Cancer Candidate Biomarker and Therapy Target Discovery 92%
- BC-Predict: Mining of signal biomarkers and multilevel validation of cascade classifier for early-stage breast cancer subtyping and prognosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of factors mediating the signaling convergenceof multiple receptors following cell-cell interaction 94%
- Spatial cell graph analysis reveals skin tissue organization characteristic for cutaneous T cell lymphoma 93%
- Network- and Enrichment-based Inference of Phenotypes and Targets from large-scale Disease Maps 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The spatial structure of the tumor immune microenvironment can explain and predict patient response in high-grade serous carcinoma 95%
- Small gene networks can delineate immune cell states and characterize immunotherapy response in melanoma 91%
- pVACtools: a computational toolkit to select and visualize cancer neoantigens 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.