Extensive antagonistic variants across human genome
Bian, B.; Hivert, V.; Wray, N. R.; McRae, A. F.
Show abstract
Pleiotropic conflict, where a genetic locus has antagonistic effects on different traits, is a common phenomenon observed in animals and plants. While pleiotropy has been widely reported in humans, there is no systematic study of pleiotropic conflict in humans. Here, we leverage GWAS summary statistics of complex diseases and traits derived from large-scale population cohorts to identify pleiotropic regions with conflicting effects. Through a multi-trait colocalization approach, we identified 219 independent regions containing variants showing pleiotropic conflict, which cover [~]11.4% of linkage disequilibrium blocks in the human genome. Antagonistic variants are observed to be enriched for SNPs with intermediate minor allele frequencies and antagonistic regions show signatures of positive/balancing selection. Our results suggest that antagonistic variants are pervasive in humans and indicate their role in maintaining phenotypic and genetic diversity in humans.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Large scale genome-wide association study in a Japanese population identified 45 novel susceptibility loci for 22 diseases 98%
- Central role of glycosylation processes in human genetic susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infections with Omicron variants 97%
- Systematic assessment of regulatory effects of human disease variants in pluripotent cells 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic adaptation to pathogens and increased risk of inflammatory disorders in post-Neolithic Europe 97%
- Trans-eQTL mapping in gene sets identifies network effects of genetic variants 97%
- Proteome-wide Mendelian randomization in global biobank meta-analysis reveals multi-ancestry drug targets for common diseases 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.