Back

Early Diagnosis and Prognostic Prediction of Colorectal Cancer through Plasma Methylation Regions

Zhu, L.; Yang, L.; Men, F.; Yu, J.; Sun, S.; Li, C.; Ma, X.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Tian, J.; Wang, X.; Xie, H.; Kang, Q.; Duan, L.; Yi, X.; Guo, W.; Gong, X.; Guo, N.; Lu, Y.; Leung, J.; He, Y.; Sheng, J.

2024-12-05 oncology
10.1101/2024.11.28.24317652 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation is a valuable biomarker in various cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC), but marker for both early diagnosis and prognostic prediction remain a critical unmet need. Here, we report the development of a 27-DMR (differentially methylated regions) plasma panel with dual diagnostic and prognostic functions. We first identified CRC-specific methylation features from 119 tissue samples and 161 plasma samples. Machine learning algorithms were then applied to develop diagnosis and prognosis models using the plasma samples in training cohort. In the tissue external validation cohort (GSE48684), the cfDNA methylation diagnosis model conducted with the panel, achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.983, and for the plasma cfDNA model in the external validation cohort, the sensitivities for NAA, AA and CRC 0 - II are 48.4%, 52.2% and 66.7% respectively, with a specificity of 88%. Beyond its diagnostic capabilities, the methylation panel was also a powerful predictor of distant metastasis (AUC = 0.955) and patient prognosis (AUC = 0.867). Using normal samples as control, the changes in methylation score in both tissue and plasma were consistent across different lesions, although the degree of alterations varied with severity. The methylation scores vary between paired tissue and blood samples, suggesting distinct mechanisms of migration from tumor tissue to blood for the 27 DMRs. Together, our cfDNA methylation models based on 27 DMRs can identify different stages of CRC and predict metastasis and prognosis, ultimately enabling early intervention and risk stratification for CRC patients.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 4%
15.3%
2
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.6%
5
Molecular Cancer
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
7
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.5%
9
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Cell Discovery
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
23
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
27
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
28
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
29
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
30
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%