Back

A Comparative Review of Deep Learning Methods for RNA Tertiary Structure Prediction

Martinovic, I.; Vlasic, T.; Li, Y.; Hooi, B.; Zhang, Y.; Sikic, M.

2024-12-03 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.11.27.625779 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Several deep learning-based tools for RNA 3D structure prediction have recently emerged, including DRfold, DeepFoldRNA, RhoFold, RoseTTAFoldNA, trRosettaRNA, and AlphaFold 3. In this study, we systematically evaluate these six models on three datasets: RNA Puzzles, CASP15 RNA targets, and a newly generated dataset of sequentially distinct RNAs, which serves as a benchmark for generalization capabilities. To ensure a robust evaluation, we also introduce a fourth, more stringent dataset that contains both sequentially and structurally distinct RNAs. We observed that each model predicts the best structure for certain RNAs, and evaluated whether commonly used scoring functions, Rosetta score and ARES, can reliably identify the most accurate structure from the predictions. Finally, since many RNA chains in the Protein Data Bank are part of complexes, we compare the performance of RoseTTAFoldNA and AlphaFold 3 in predicting RNA structures within complexes versus isolated RNA chains extracted from these complexes. This comprehensive evaluation highlights the strengths and limitations of current deep learning-based tools and provides valuable insights for advancing RNA 3D structure prediction.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.