SNMF: Integrated Learning of Mutational Signatures and Prediction of DNA Repair Deficiencies
Goossens, S. A. C. H.; Tepeli, Y. I.; Seale, C.; Goncalves, J. P.
Show abstract
MotivationMany tumours show deficiencies in DNA damage response (DDR), which influence tumorigenesis and progression, but also expose vulnerabilities with therapeutic potential. Assessing which patients might benefit from DDR-targeting therapy requires knowledge of tumour DDR deficiency status, with mutational signatures reportedly better predictors than loss of function mutations in select genes. However, signatures are identified independently using unsupervised learning, and therefore not optimised to distinguish between different pathway or gene deficiencies. ResultsWe propose SNMF, a supervised non-negative matrix factorisation that jointly optimises the learning of signatures: (1) shared across samples, and (2) predictive of DDR deficiency. We applied SNMF to mutation profiles of human induced pluripotent cell lines carrying gene knockouts linked to three DDR pathways. The SNMF model achieved high accuracy (0.971) and learned more complete signatures of the DDR status of a sample, further discerning distinct mechanisms within a pathway. Cell line SNMF signatures recapitulated tumour-derived COSMIC signatures and predicted DDR pathway deficiency of TCGA tumours with high recall, suggesting that SNMF-like models can leverage libraries of induced DDR deficiencies to decipher intricate DDR signatures underlying patient tumours. Availabilityhttps://github.com/joanagoncalveslab/SNMF.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- CaClust: linking genotype to transcriptional heterogeneity of follicular lymphoma using BCR and exomic variants 95%
- N-of-one differential gene expression without control samples using a deep generative model 94%
- BASCULE: Bayesian inference and clustering of mutational signatures leveraging biological priors 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.