Automated Evaluation for Pericardial Effusion and Cardiac Tamponade with Echocardiographic Artificial Intelligence
Chiu, I.-M.; Vukadinovic, M.; Sahashi, Y.; Cheng, P.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Cheng, S.; Ouyang, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundTimely and accurate detection of pericardial effusion and assessment cardiac tamponade remain challenging and highly operator dependent. ObjectivesArtificial intelligence has advanced many echocardiographic assessments, and we aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model to automate the assessment of pericardial effusion severity and cardiac tamponade from echocardiogram videos. MethodsWe developed a deep learning model (EchoNet-Pericardium) using temporal-spatial convolutional neural networks to automate pericardial effusion severity grading and tamponade detection from echocardiography videos. The model was trained using a retrospective dataset of 1,427,660 videos from 85,380 echocardiograms at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC) to predict PE severity and cardiac tamponade across individual echocardiographic views and an ensemble approach combining predictions from five standard views. External validation was performed on 33,310 videos from 1,806 echocardiograms from Stanford Healthcare (SHC). ResultsIn the held out CSMC test set, EchoNet-Pericardium achieved an AUC of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.884- 0.916) for detecting moderate or larger pericardial effusion, 0.942 (95% CI: 0.917-0.964) for large pericardial effusion, and 0.955 (95% CI: 0.939-0.968) for cardiac tamponade. In the SHC external validation cohort, the model achieved AUCs of 0.869 (95% CI: 0.794-0.933) for moderate or larger pericardial effusion, 0.959 (95% CI: 0.945-0.972) for large pericardial effusion, and 0.966 (95% CI: 0.906-0.995) for cardiac tamponade. Subgroup analysis demonstrated consistent performance across ages, sexes, left ventricular ejection fraction, and atrial fibrillation statuses. ConclusionsOur deep learning-based framework accurately grades pericardial effusion severity and detects cardiac tamponade from echocardiograms, demonstrating consistent performance and generalizability across different cohorts. This automated tool has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making by reducing operator dependence and expediting diagnosis.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning-Based Multi-View Echocardiographic Framework for Comprehensive Diagnosis of Pericardial Disease 97%
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Mitral Valve Prolapse and Mitral Regurgitation with Video-based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms 95%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 93%
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Non-Invasive Scale Measurement of Cardiac Output Compared with the Gold-Standard Direct Fick Method: A Feasibility Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural Language Processing for the Ascertainment and Phenotyping of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy on Echocardiogram Reports 94%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 94%
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning-based Prediction of Early Cerebrovascular Events after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 94%
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 93%
- Evaluation of the second-generation whole-heart motion correction algorithm (SSF2) used to demonstrate the aortic annulus on cardiac CT 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.