Back

Digital genetic counselling services for cascade cardiogenetic testing: a focus group study on proband, relative, and provider perspectives

van Lingen, M. N.; van Till, S. A. L.; Giesbertz, N. A. A.; Beinema, T. C.; Ausems, M. G. E. M.; Klaassen, R.; Cornel, M. C.; van den Heuvel, L. M.; van Tintelen, J. P.

2024-12-05 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.11.27.24318108 medRxiv
Show abstract

Digital interventions are potentially promising to improve accessibility and efficiency of genetic counselling services. However, current literature on stakeholder perspectives towards digital tools for cascade testing is limited. Therefore, this focus group study aimed to gain insights into the attitude and perspectives of probands, at-risk relatives (ARR), and genetic healthcare professionals (HCP) towards digital innovations for assistance with both pre-test and post-test counselling and cascade genetic testing in cardiogenetics. We conducted seven online focus groups, which where transcribed and thematically analysed. In total, 37 individuals participated (10 probands, 11 ARR and 16 HCP). Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts showed a first theme of (1) acceptability of digital tools. Other identified themes were defined as domains where digital tools impact traditional, in-person clinical genetic care, being: (2) family communication, (3) decision-making, (4) care relations, and (5) the genetic care system. Stakeholders expressed a predominantly positive attitude towards digitisation of (parts of) the predictive genetic counselling in cardiogenetics, under the condition that access to human contact is preserved. In the clinical setting of predictive counselling, efforts should be made to ensure access to genetic services for all ARR and to protect in-person involvement of HCP.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.9%
2
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
6
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
7
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
8
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
9
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
11
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
14
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%