Digital genetic counselling services for cascade cardiogenetic testing: a focus group study on proband, relative, and provider perspectives
van Lingen, M. N.; van Till, S. A. L.; Giesbertz, N. A. A.; Beinema, T. C.; Ausems, M. G. E. M.; Klaassen, R.; Cornel, M. C.; van den Heuvel, L. M.; van Tintelen, J. P.
Show abstract
Digital interventions are potentially promising to improve accessibility and efficiency of genetic counselling services. However, current literature on stakeholder perspectives towards digital tools for cascade testing is limited. Therefore, this focus group study aimed to gain insights into the attitude and perspectives of probands, at-risk relatives (ARR), and genetic healthcare professionals (HCP) towards digital innovations for assistance with both pre-test and post-test counselling and cascade genetic testing in cardiogenetics. We conducted seven online focus groups, which where transcribed and thematically analysed. In total, 37 individuals participated (10 probands, 11 ARR and 16 HCP). Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts showed a first theme of (1) acceptability of digital tools. Other identified themes were defined as domains where digital tools impact traditional, in-person clinical genetic care, being: (2) family communication, (3) decision-making, (4) care relations, and (5) the genetic care system. Stakeholders expressed a predominantly positive attitude towards digitisation of (parts of) the predictive genetic counselling in cardiogenetics, under the condition that access to human contact is preserved. In the clinical setting of predictive counselling, efforts should be made to ensure access to genetic services for all ARR and to protect in-person involvement of HCP.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of a novel educational program for providers on the use of polygenic risk scores 94%
- GUIA: a digital platform to facilitate result disclosure in genetic counseling 93%
- ClinGen Variant Curation Interface Workshops: Training Variant Scientists on an International Platform 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 94%
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 94%
- Analysis of large-language model versus human performance for genetics questions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of DNA-poli: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to assess a digital platform for family cascade genetic testing and predictive genetic counselling 95%
- A Pooled Electronic Consultation Program to Improve Access to Genetics Specialists 92%
- Early Diagnosis of Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Through AI-Powered Facial Analysis: Results from the Montalcino Aortic Consortium 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feedback of Individual Genetic and Genomics Research Results: A Qualitative Study Involving Grassroots Communities in Uganda 94%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 91%
- ChatGPT- versus human-generated answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes: a Turing test-inspired survey among employees of a Danish diabetes center 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 94%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 93%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.