Telemedicine to Address Inequities in Access to Primary Health Care for Minority Groups: A protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Silva, G. O. L.; Fernandes, G. R.; Moreira Pereira, E.; Castro da Rocha, J.; Tizianel Aguilar, G.; Sigal Linhares, T.; Dutra Dode, A.; Cezar Cabral, F.; Moreira, T. D. C.; Eulalia Vinade Chagas, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe present article outlines the protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at consolidating the available evidence on how telemedicine can reduce inequities in access to Primary Health Care (PHC) among minority populations. The review seeks to identify barriers, facilitators, and factors that influence the effectiveness of this intervention across different settings. MethodsThis protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis is reported in line with Prisma-P and the results will be reported using PRISMA-E flowchart. The eligibility criteria was defined using the PICOS approach. Population is minority groups that have used telemedicine, the intervention is synchronous and asynchronous telemedicine, the comparator will consist of minority groups that have received usual care, outcome is access to primary health care and we will include randomized controlled trials. We will search MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Latina American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) databases. The risk of bias will be assessed using the ROBINS-I and the confidence in cumulative evidence will be assessed using the GRADE equity tool. DiscussionIt is expected to provide pragmatic results, such supporting decision-making regarding the creation and implementation of new public policies, the development of clinical guidelines, and the optimization of resources aimed at equitable access. Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42024581305
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 96%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 95%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
- Effectiveness of integrating cervical cancer prevention strategies into HIV care programmes: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of cash transfer and incentive programs on service utilization and treatment outcomes related to neglected tropical diseases and their impact on health and nutrition in low and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review 94%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 92%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 95%
- Digital Health Technologies for Accessing Contraceptive Services among Young People in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 91%
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 91%
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.