Back

Systematic exploration of domain assortments in NOD-like receptors uncovers two types of NACHT domains in Sordariales fungi

bonometti, l.; charriat, f.; hensen, n.; Minana Posada, S.; johannesson, h.; Gladieux, P.

2024-11-28 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.11.26.625400 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFungi have NOD-Like receptors (NLRs), analogous to the innate immune receptors found in animals, plants and bacteria. Fungal NLRs are characterized by a great variability of domain organizations, but the identity of the nucleotide-binding domains, the genomic localization, and the factors associated with variation in the composition of repertoires of fungal NLRs are not yet fully understood. To better understand the variability of fungal NLR repertoires and the underlying determinants, we conducted a thorough analysis of genome data from the ascomycete order Sordariales. ResultsUsing similarity searches based on hidden Markov models profiles for canonical N-terminal, nucleotide-binding, or C-terminal domains, we characterized 4613 NLRs in 82 Sordariales taxa. By examining the Helical Third section of the nucleotide-binding domains, we substantially improved their annotation. We demonstrated that fungi have NACHT domains of both NAIP-like and TLP1-like types, similar to animals. We found that the number of NLR genes was highly variable among Sordariales families, and independent of the stringency of defense mechanisms against genomic repeat elements. NLRs were organized in clusters in the majority of taxa, and the strong correlation between the number of NLRs and the number of NLR clusters suggested that organizing in clusters may contribute to repertoire diversification. ConclusionsOur work highlights the similarity of fungal and animal NLRs in terms of nucleotide-binding domain types, and between fungal and plant NLRs in terms of genomic organization in clusters. Our findings will aid in the comparative analysis of the patterns and processes of diversification of NLR repertoires in various lineages of fungi and between the different kingdoms and domains of life.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.