Lateralised memory networks explain the use of higher-order visual features in navigating insects
Filippi, G.; Knight, J.; Philippides, A.; Graham, P.
Show abstract
Many insects use memories of their visual environment to adaptively drive spatial behaviours. In ants, visual memories are fundamental for navigation, whereby foragers follow long visually guided routes to foraging sites and return to the location of their nest. Whilst we understand the basic visual pathway to the memory centres (Optic Lobes to Mushroom Bodies) involved in the storage of visual information, it is still largely unknown what type of representation of visual scenes underpins view-based navigation in ants. Several experimental studies have shown ants using "higher-order" visual information - that is features extracted across the whole extent of a visual scene - which raises the question as to where these features are computed. One such experimental study showed that ants can use the proportion of a shape experienced left of their visual centre to learn and recapitulate a route, a feature referred to as "fractional position of mass" (FPM). In this work, we use a simple model constrained by the known neuroanatomy and information processing properties of the Mushroom Bodies to explore whether the use of the FPM could be a resulting factor of the bilateral organisation of the insect brain, all the whilst assuming a "retinotopic" view representation. We demonstrate that such bilaterally organised memory models can implicitly encode the FPM learned during training. We find that balancing the "quality" of the memory match across left and right hemispheres allows a trained model to retrieve the FPM defined direction, even when the model is tested with other shapes, as demonstrated by ants. The result is shown to be largely independent of model parameter values, therefore suggesting that some aspects of higher-order processing of a visual scene may be emergent from the structure of the neural circuits, rather than computed in discrete processing modules. Author summaryMany insects are excellent visual navigators, often relying on visual memories to follow long foraging routes and return safely to their nest location. We have a good understanding of the neural substrates supporting the storage of visual memories in ants. However, it is still largely unknown what type of representation of visual scenes underpins the functions of visual navigation. Experimental studies have shown ants using "higher-order" features as part of navigation, that is features that are extracted across the whole extent of a visual scene. Using an anatomically constrained model of the insect memory centers, we address the question of whether the use of higher-order visual features may be emergent from the overall architecture of the vision-to-memory pathways. We find that balancing the quality of left and right visual memory matches provides an explanation for some higher-order visual processing and visual cognition shown in experiments with ants. Overall, this constitutes a contribution to our understanding of visual cognition and the processing of visual scenes used in navigational tasks. We additionally postulate a novel mechanism ants may use to navigate, which is supported by the bilateral structure of the insect brain.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A unified mechanism for innate and learned visual landmark guidance in the insect central complex 96%
- Estimating orientation in Natural scenes: A Spiking Neural Network Model of the Insect Central Complex 96%
- Ant visual route navigation: How the fine details of behaviour promote successful route performance and convergence 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Model for Navigation in Unknown Environments Based on a Reservoir of Hippocampal Sequences 95%
- Sparse Coding with a Somato-Dendritic Rule 95%
- A systematic analysis of the joint effects of ganglion cells, lagged LGN cells, and intercortical inhibition on spatiotemporal processing and direction selectivity 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.