Back

A Versatile Anti-CRISPR Platform for Opto- and Chemogenetic Control of CRISPR-Cas9 and Cas12 across a Wide Range of Orthologs

Brenker, L.; Aschenbrenner, S.; Bubeck, F.; Staykov, K.; Gebhardt, C.; Wolf, B.; Jendrusch, M.; Kroell, A.-S.; Mathony, J.; Niopek, D.

2024-11-25 synthetic biology
10.1101/2024.11.25.625186 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CRISPR-Cas technologies have revolutionized life sciences by enabling programmable genome editing across diverse organisms. Achieving dynamic and precise control over CRISPR-Cas activity with exogenous triggers, such as light or chemical ligands, remains an important need. Existing tools for CRISPR-Cas control are often limited to specific Cas orthologs or selected applications, restricting their versatility. Anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins, natural inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas systems, provide a flexible regulatory layer but are constitutively active in their native forms. In this study, we built on our previously reported concept for optogenetic CRISPR-Cas control with engineered, light-switchable anti-CRISPR proteins and expanded it from ortholog-specific Acrs towards AcrIIA5 and AcrVA1, broad-spectrum inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas9 and -Cas12a, respectively. We then conceived and implemented a novel, chemogenetic anti-CRISPR platform based on engineered, circularly permuted ligand receptor domains of human origin, that together respond to six different, clinically-relevant drugs. The resulting toolbox achieves both optogenetic and chemogenetic control of genome editing in human cells with a wide range of CRISPR-Cas effectors, including type II-A and -C CRISPR-Cas9s, and -Cas12a. In sum, this work establishes a versatile platform for multidimensional control of CRISPR-Cas systems, with immediate applications in basic research and biotechnology and potential for therapeutic use in the future.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.