Back

A novel framework for assessing the power of genomic animal models in wild non-model organisms

Thia, J. A.; Riginos, C.; Hereward, J.; Liggins, L.; Jasper, M.; Aguirre, J. D.; McGuigan, K.

2025-08-24 genomics
10.1101/2024.11.25.625127 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIThe relative contributions of heritable versus non-heritable phenotypic variation determine how selection may shape evolutionary responses. While genome-wide association studies can provide some insight into large-effect loci underpinning phenotypes, they potentially miss much of the evolutionarily important variation in polygenic traits because many small-effect loci will contribute to heritable variation. C_LIO_LIGenomic animal models can estimate trait heritability from genomic data but are often difficult to apply to wild organisms. Sampling groups of close kin improves their power, yet this can be logistically challenging in species with large populations and high dispersal. Furthermore, many common approaches for power simulations rely on kin structure in the genomic relationship matrix, A, but such simulations on an unstructured A (comprised of unrelated individuals) are likely uninformative. C_LIO_LIWe developed a novel framework to generate simulated expectations from genomic animal models when applied to samples of unrelated wild organisms. A key innovation of this framework is the use of a phenotypes-from-genotypes approach that allows quantitative traits to be simulated from genotypes, independently of A. This provides clear utility where kin structure is absent. We illustrated the use and flexibility of our phenotypes-from-genotypes simulation approach to explore how the performance of genomic animal models can be influenced by different genetic architectures (clumped vs even genomic distribution of QTLs, and different QTL effect sizes), levels of heritability, and experimental design (sampled individuals and genetic markers). C_LIO_LIWe then applied our framework to a study of head shape traits in a wild marine intertidal fish, Bathygobius cocosensis (Bleeker 1854), for which we acquired SNP genotypes with RADseq. Although our working sample of 297 fish contained no close kin, our framework helped validate the power of genomic animal models, allowing us to confidently infer heritable variation in one head shape trait (estimated h2 = 0.17). C_LIO_LIOur study addresses key methodological gaps for using quantitative genomic approaches on wild organisms, offering a rare example of partitioned heritable and non-heritable contributions to phenotypic variation in a non-model wild marine fish. Our novel phenotypes-from-genotypes approach also provides a new method for simulating QTLs using observed population genetic data. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
12.0%
3
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.0%
5
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
12
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
14
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
19
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
23
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%