Back

Long-term Outcomes of Poor-grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Multicentre Observational Cohort Study

Wang, B.; Li, T.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; An, X.; Hao, J.; Wang, K.; Yang, X.

2024-11-27 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2024.11.25.24317947 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDDespite advancements in neurosurgery and intensive care that reduce overall mortality, poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies [WFNS] grades IV and V) remains a significant clinical challenge and is associated with persistently high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of poor-grade aSAH and to identify factors influencing patient prognosis to guide clinical management. METHODSA multicentre, observational cohort study was conducted across 12 regional centres in northern China. The study included patients with poor-grade aSAH admitted from 2017 to 2020. The baseline data included demographics, clinical presentation, aneurysm characteristics, and treatment modalities. Outcome data, including survival status, mortality along with its associated causes and timing, and modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores, were collected prospectively at the last medical follow-up. Changes in case fatality over time were quantified with weighted linear regression. Survival analysis was performed to estimate survival and hazard ratios for death. Binary logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratio for dependency (mRS=3-5). RESULTSAmong the 1,589 enrolled patients, 1,339 were successfully followed, with an average follow-up of 26.37 months. Among them, 61.5% (824/1,339) were dependent or died. The overall mortality rate was 51% (684/1,339), and 21.3% (140/655) of the survivors were dependent. The risk factors for mortality included age [≥]65 years, previous history of stroke, and WFNS grade V. Additionally, conservative treatment and endovascular treatment were identified as risk factors and protective factors, respectively, compared with surgical treatment. WFNS grade V and middle cerebral artery aneurysms are independent risk factors for dependency. CONCLUSIONSAlthough there has been a downward trend in recent years, the long-term mortality rate for poor-grade aSAH has remained significantly high at 51%, with 21.3% of survivors being dependent. Active aneurysm treatment, to the extent possible, is crucial for improving the prognosis of these patients.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.7%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.6%
6
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
10
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
13
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
14
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
21
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%