Evidence for non-optimal codon choice in highly transcribed sex-biased genes of Drosophila melanogaster
Whittle, C. A.; Extavour, C. G.
Show abstract
Biases in synonymous codon use occur in many unicellular and multicellular organisms. Optimal codons, defined as those most commonly used in highly transcribed genes, are thought to arise from selection for cost-efficient translation, which would favor codons with abundant matching tRNAs. Such presumed selection is described as optimal codon choice. Non-optimal codons, defined as those least commonly used in highly transcribed genes, may in principle also play important roles, but the dynamics of their use remain understudied. Here we examine non-optimal codon use, using sex-biased genes expressed in the gonads of Drosophila melanogaster as a case study. We show that genes with sex-biased expression exhibit a preference for non-optimal codon use, especially testis-biased genes. Further we show that the use of non-optimal codons is not random. Instead, specific non-optimal codons are favored, again especially in testis-biased genes. Non-optimal codon use is positively linked to elevated disorder of the encoded proteins. Remarkably, all 18 degenerate amino acids were associated with higher disorder when encoded by the identified primary non-optimal codon, than when encoded by its sister optimal codon. We hypothesize that selection may have promoted non-optimal codon choice for a subset of favored non-optimal codons to regulate translation. We discuss the putative roles of tRNA gene copy numbers, pleiotropy, and sex-biased expression in the evolution of this level of gene regulation. Significance StatementOptimal codons, those codons most commonly used in highly expressed protein-coding genes, are thought to improve translational efficiency in a range of organisms. However, relatively minimal attention has been given to non-optimal codons, those least often used in highly transcribed genes, and their potential roles in translation. Here, using sex-biased gonadal genes of Drosophila melanogaster as a model system, we demonstrate that non-optimal codons are preferentially used in sex-biased genes, particularly within highly expressed testis-biased genes, and are associated with disordered proteins. Moreover, the preference for a specific non-optimal codon (per amino acid) is ubiquitous across all degenerate amino acids. We propose that non-optimal codon use is non-random and may have evolved under selection for roles in translational regulation and protein folding in sex-biased genes, and in a manner associated with their tRNA abundances. The findings have significant implications for the understanding of pacing of translation, protein conformation and protein functionality.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for a force favouring GC over AT at short intronic sites in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster 93%
- Frequent lineage-specific substitution rate changes support an episodic model for protein evolution 93%
- A Novel Mistranslating tRNA Model in Drosophila melanogaster has Diverse, Sexually Dimorphic Effects 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural variation in codon bias and mRNA folding strength interact synergistically to modify protein expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 96%
- Single-nucleus transcriptomes reveal functional and evolutionary properties of cell types in the Drosophila accessory gland 94%
- Evolved differences in cis and trans regulation between the maternal and zygotic mRNA complements in the Drosophila embryo 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- No Ramp Needed: Spandrels, Statistics, and a Slippery Slope 94%
- Protein evidence of unannotated ORFs in Drosophila reveals unappreciated diversity in the evolution of young proteins 93%
- The protein domains of vertebrate species in whichselection is more effective have greater intrinsicstructural disorder 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.